Personal tools
 
Views

Welcome to Debatepedia!

From Debatepedia

(Difference between revisions)
Jump to: navigation, search
Revision as of 13:14, 15 May 2011 (edit)
Brooks Lindsay (Talk | contribs)

← Previous diff
Current revision (05:00, 14 November 2011) (edit)
Brooks Lindsay (Talk | contribs)

 
Line 1: Line 1:
-<seo title="Debatepedia the Wikipedia of Debates" metak="debatepedia, debate, capital punishment debate, debateapedia, abortion debate, same sex marriage, idebate, debatapedia, universal health care, debates, animal experimentation, debate wiki, arguments, pro, con" metad="Debatepedia is a wiki encyclopedia of pro and con arguments and quotations in important public debates from around the world. It is considered the Wikipedia of debate, helping the world centralize arguments and quotations found in millions of different articles, essays, books, and your own original thinking into a single encyclopedia, so that citizens can better understand important public debates and make informed choices. Join this cause and community and become an editor of the site. Your efforts will improve your own thinking and have a major impact on the way thousands of other citizens draw conclusions." />+<seo title="the Wikipedia of Debates" metak="debatepedia, debate, capital punishment debate, debateapedia, abortion debate, same sex marriage, idebate, debatapedia, universal health care, debates, animal experimentation, debate wiki, arguments, pro, con" metad="Debatepedia is a wiki encyclopedia of pro and con arguments and quotations in important public debates from around the world. It is considered the Wikipedia of debate, helping the world centralize arguments and quotations found in millions of different articles, essays, books, and your own original thinking into a single encyclopedia, so that citizens can better understand important public debates and make informed choices. Join this cause and community and become an editor of the site. Your efforts will improve your own thinking and have a major impact on the way thousands of other citizens draw conclusions." />
{|style="font-size:100%; padding:.4em;padding-top:0.5em;" cellpadding="5" {|style="font-size:100%; padding:.4em;padding-top:0.5em;" cellpadding="5"
|- |-
|colspan="2" width="45%" bgcolor="#F2F2F2" style="border:1px solid #BAC5FD;padding:.4em;padding-top:0.5em;"| |colspan="2" width="45%" bgcolor="#F2F2F2" style="border:1px solid #BAC5FD;padding:.4em;padding-top:0.5em;"|
[[Image:Nfl_logo_small.gif|right|34px|http://www.nflonline.org/]] [[Image:Nfl_logo_small.gif|right|34px|http://www.nflonline.org/]]
-'''Debatepedia is essentially the Wikipedia of debates. It is an encyclopedia of pro and con arguments and quotes.''' A project of the 501c3 non-profit '''[http://www.idebate.org/ International Debate Education Association (IDEA)]''', Debatepedia utilizes the same wiki technology powering Wikipedia to engage you and other editors in centralizing arguments and quotes found in editorials, op-eds, books, and around the web into comprehensive pro/con articles. This helps citizens and decision-makers better deliberate on the world's most important questions. Debatepedia is endorsed by the [http://www.nflonline.org National Forensic League].+'''Debatepedia is the Wikipedia of debates - an encyclopedia of pro and con arguments and quotes on critical issues.''' A project of the 501c3 non-profit '''International Debate Education Association (IDEA),''' Debatepedia utilizes the same wiki technology powering Wikipedia to centralize arguments and quotes found in editorials, op-eds, political statements, and books into comprehensive pro/con articles. This helps citizens and decision-makers better deliberate on the world's most important questions. Debatepedia is endorsed by the [http://www.nflonline.org National Forensic League].
|- |-
Line 11: Line 11:
<div style="margin:0;background:#fF9D1C;font-family:sans-serif;font-size:120%;font-weight:bold;border:1px solid #010101;text-align:left;color:#000;padding-left:0.4em;padding-top:0.2em;padding-bottom:0.2em;"> The Debate Digest </div> <div style="margin:0;background:#fF9D1C;font-family:sans-serif;font-size:120%;font-weight:bold;border:1px solid #010101;text-align:left;color:#000;padding-left:0.4em;padding-top:0.2em;padding-bottom:0.2em;"> The Debate Digest </div>
-A steady supply of our latest and most refined pro/con articles to help you deliberate, take a stand, take action, vote, and back yourself up.+Our latest and best pro/con articles to help you develop a position on the world's most important issues.
-*'''[[Debate: China "one child" policy]] - May 12th, 2011.+*'''<big>[[Debate: Occupy protests]]</big>'''
- +
-:[http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=H4OWJlyaHt0 "One Child Policy - China" on YouTube]+
-<center><youtube>H4OWJlyaHt0</youtube></center>+
'''Featured pro and con arguments from this article:''' '''Featured pro and con arguments from this article:'''
 +*'''PRO: [[Argument: Occupy protesters have common message to right capitalism| Occupy protesters have common message to right capitalism]]''' [http://www.economist.com/blogs/dailychart/2011/10/occupy-protests "Cross continents." The Economist. Oct 17th 2011]:[[Image:Occupy Wall Street.jpg|right|180px]]"they do share a common demand: someone, somewhere, should do something to right the problems of global capitalism as currently constituted. One reason why these protests are so interesting is that their targets, those cheerleaders for globalisation, capitalism and free markets, tend to agree that the system needs fixing. This makes the 'occupy' protests, as they have come to be known in the English-speaking world, hard to argue against."
-*'''PRO: [[Argument: China's "one child" policy is key to stabilizing global population growth| China's "one child" policy is key to stabilizing global population growth]]''' [http://www.fmprc.gov.cn/ce/cegv/eng/bjzl/t176938.htm "Family Planning in China". Information Office of the State Council Of the People's Republic of China. 1995]: "China is home to more than one-fifth of the world's population. It thoroughly understands the responsibility it bears in stabilizing world population growth and the essential role it should play. Family planning as an effective solution to China's population problems is more than just responsibility towards the well-being of the Chinese people and future generations; it is a duty owed to maintaining the stability of the world population. Working for the common interests of all of humanity, at the same time working for individual interests of each nation, the international community and each nation should work together to solve the population problems facing individual nations and the entire world. This will promote development and progress in every country and throughout human society."+*'''CON: Occupy protests lack common/coherent message.''' [http://www.studlife.com/forum/staff-editorials/2011/10/17/occupy-protests-need-to-focus-on-coherent-demands/ "Occupy protests need to focus on coherent demands." Student Life Staff Editorial. October 17th, 2011]: "The protests have been linked and compared to the tea party movement, due to their similar grassroots nature and extreme ideological stances. However, the tea party does have a centralized message, which the “Occupy” protests lack.[[Image:Occupy Protest 2.jpg|right|180px]] The tea party is about reducing taxes and cutting spending to make government smaller. Regardless of whether or not you agree with the tea party’s stances, it is possible to know what the entire group and all of its smaller subsidiaries are about. We believe the “Occupy” protests need to do the same thing. Define and convey their message correctly, and stick to reasonable demands that resonate with the rest of the American public. Most of the country has been seriously hurt by the financial crisis, and most of the American public wants to focus on creating a more equal and fair country. There is a lot of room for the “Occupy” protests to grow, but without a consistent message, most Americans will be turned off."
- +
-*'''CON: Condoms/sex-ed better population control than "one child"''' [http://www.economist.com/node/18651512 "China's population: The most surprising demographic crisis." The Economist. May 5th 2011]: "coercive controls had little to do with lowering fertility, which would have happened anyway. Countries that simply improved access to contraceptives—Thailand and Indonesia, for instance—did as much to reduce fertility as China, with its draconian policies. Taiwan, which the government in Beijing regards as an integral part of China, cut its fertility rate as much as China without population controls."+
<div style="margin:0;background:#fF9D1C;font-family:sans-serif;font-size:120%;font-weight:bold;border:1px solid #010101;text-align:left;color:#000;padding-left:0.4em;padding-top:0.2em;padding-bottom:0.2em;"> Recent Debate Digest articles </div> <div style="margin:0;background:#fF9D1C;font-family:sans-serif;font-size:120%;font-weight:bold;border:1px solid #010101;text-align:left;color:#000;padding-left:0.4em;padding-top:0.2em;padding-bottom:0.2em;"> Recent Debate Digest articles </div>
- +*'''[[Debate: Does Obama deserve a second term?| Does Obama deserve a second term?]]''' - October 10th, 2011.
 +*'''[[Debate: UN recognition of Palestinian statehood| UN recognition of Palestinian statehood]]''' - September 26th, 2011.
 +*'''[[Debate: American Jobs Act| American Jobs Act]]''' - September 17th, 2011.
 +*'''[[Debate: Keystone XL US-Canada oil pipeline| Keystone XL US-Canada oil pipeline]]''' - September 5th, 2011.
 +*'''[[Debate: Teacher-student friendships on Facebook| Teacher-student friendships on Facebook]]''' - September 2nd, 2011.
 +*'''[[Debate: Law school| Law school]]''' - August 29th, 2011.
 +*'''[[Debate: Balanced budget amendment to US Constitution| Balanced budget amendment]]''' - August 9th, 2011.
 +*'''[[Debate: US debt ceiling deal| US debt ceiling deal]]''' - August 5th, 2011.
 +*'''[[Debate: Obama executive order to raise the debt ceiling| Obama executive order to raise the debt ceiling]]''' - August 1st, 2011.
 +*'''[[Debate: Pornography| Pornography]]''' - July 27th, 2011.
 +*'''[[Debate: Legality of coca production and consumption| Legality of coca production and consumption]]''' - July 20th, 2011.
 +*'''[[Debate: Ban on sale of violent video games to minors| Ban on sale of violent video games to minors]]''' - July 8th, 2011.[[Image:Map of the world.jpg|right|240px]]
 +*'''[[Debate: Mandatory ultrasounds before abortions| Mandatory ultrasounds before abortions]]''' - June 30th, 2011.
 +*'''[[Debate: US intervention in Libya| US intervention in Libya]]''' - June 19th, 2011.
 +*'''[[Debate: Should colleges ban fraternities?|Should colleges ban fraternities?]]''' - June 15th, 2011.
 +*'''[[Debate: Random sobriety tests for drivers|Random sobriety tests for drivers]]''' - June 7th, 2011.
 +*'''[[Debate: Home plate collision rule in baseball| Home plate collision rule in baseball]]''' - June 1, 2011.
 +*'''[[Debate: Child beauty pageants| Child beauty pageants]]''' - May 28th, 2011.
 +*'''[[Debate: Trans fat ban| Trans fat ban]]''' - May 19th, 2011.
 +*'''[[Debate: China "one child" policy| China "one child" policy]]''' - May 12th, 2011.
*'''[[Debate: Release of Osama bin Laden death photos| Release of Osama bin Laden death photos]]''' - May 6th, 2011. *'''[[Debate: Release of Osama bin Laden death photos| Release of Osama bin Laden death photos]]''' - May 6th, 2011.
*'''[[Debate: Osama Bin Laden Sea Burial| Osama Bin Laden Sea Burial]]''' - May 3rd, 2011. *'''[[Debate: Osama Bin Laden Sea Burial| Osama Bin Laden Sea Burial]]''' - May 3rd, 2011.
-*'''[[Debate: Return of Israel to pre-1967 borders| Return of Israel to pre-1967 borders]]''' - April 30th, 2011. 
-*'''[[Debate: Term limits for legislators| Term limits for legislators]]''' - April 19th, 2011. 
-*'''[[Debate: Seattle deep-bore tunnel| Seattle deep-bore tunnel]]''' - April 13th, 2011.  
-*'''[[Debate: Should the US arm Libyan rebels?| Should the US arm Libyan rebels?]]''' - April 2nd, 2011.  
-*'''[[Debate: High-speed rail| High-speed rail]]''' - March 30th, 2011.[[Image:Map of the world.jpg|right|300px]] 
-*'''[[Debate: Mandatory military service| Mandatory military service]]''' - March 26th, 2011. 
-*'''[[Debate: No-fly zone over Libya| No-fly zone over Libya]]''' - March 15th, 2011. 
-*'''[[Debate: Military recruiting in public schools| Military recruiting in public schools]]''' - March 11th, 2011. 
-*'''[[Debate: Bullfighting| Bullfighting]]''' - March 8th, 2011. 
-*'''[[Debate: Collective bargaining rights for public unions| Collective bargaining rights for public unions]]''' - March 4th, 2011. 
-*'''[[Debate: Was the War in Iraq worth it?| Was the War in Iraq worth it?]]''' - February 24th, 2011. 
-*'''[[Debate: UN Convention on the Rights of Migrant Workers and their Families| UN Convention on the Rights of Migrant Workers and their Families]]''' - February 16th, 2011. 
-*'''[[Debate: Phasing out fossil fuel subsidies| Phasing out fossil fuel subsidies]]''' - February 2nd, 2011. 
-*'''[[Debate: Concealed carry vs open carry gun laws| Concealed carry vs open carry gun laws]]''' - January 25th, 2011. 
-*'''[[Debate: Castration of sex offenders| Castration of sex offenders]]''' - January 21st, 2011. 
-*'''[[Debate: Palestinian right of return| Palestinian right of return]]''' - January 14th, 2011. 
-*'''[[Debate: Ban on mountaintop removal coal mining| Ban on mountaintop removal coal mining]]''' - January 12th, 2011. 
''See [[Past Debate Digest topics]]'' ''See [[Past Debate Digest topics]]''
- +
|width="45%" bgcolor="#f2fafb" style="border:1px solid #BAC5FD;padding:.4em;padding-top:0.5em;"| |width="45%" bgcolor="#f2fafb" style="border:1px solid #BAC5FD;padding:.4em;padding-top:0.5em;"|
-<div style="margin:0;background:#6C8FB9;font-family:sans-serif;font-size:120%;font-weight:bold;border:1px solid #010101;text-align:left;color:#000;padding-left:0.4em;padding-top:0.2em;padding-bottom:0.2em;"> Editorial News and Tasks </div>+<div style="margin:0;background:#6C8FB9;font-family:sans-serif;font-size:120%;font-weight:bold;border:1px solid #010101;text-align:left;color:#000;padding-left:0.4em;padding-top:0.2em;padding-bottom:0.2em;"> Debates In The News </div>
-This section features strong work done by Debatepedia editors. Consider joining their efforts. '''[[Debatepedia User Guide| User Guide]].''' See '''[http://wiki.idebate.org/index.php/Special:Recentchanges Recent changes]''' for all recent community edits. +*'''[[Climate change and clean energy portal]]''' Probably one of Debatepedia's best resources, this portal is always timely.
 +*'''[[Debate: Constitutionality of US health insurance mandates]]''' The Obama Administration and others are pushing for a final ruling from the Supreme Court on the constitutionality of the Affordable Care Act's mandate that Americans [with some exceptions] buy private health insurance.[[Image:Newstand.jpg|right|200px]]
 +*'''[[Debate: UN recognition of Palestinian statehood]]''' is front and center in international news, as the Palestinian Authority pursues a high-profile UN vote in favor of statehood. A majority of UN member states appear to support their push. Yet, the US has promised to veto the move in the Security Council in support of its ally Israel.
 +*'''[[Debate: American Jobs Act]]''' US President Obama submitted the American Jobs Act to Congress at a critical time in the nation's economic history. Debatepedia looks at the bill and the arguments from its supporters and detractors.
-*'''May 14th.''' [[Debate: China "one child" policy]] posted to the debate digest.+''[[Debates in the News| More Debates in the News]]''
-*'''May 12th.''' [[User:England4ever|England4ever]] has been extremely active recently, editing [[Debate: Messianic Judaism]], [[Debate: Evolution]], [[Debate: Tibet independence]], [[Debate: Aaland Islands]], and [[Debate: Should the UK split up?]]. +
-*'''May 8th.''' KProM40A3 wrote the following argument against [[Debate: Animal testing| animal testing]] on the article's talk page: "It's Wrong! I may only be 13 years of a age, but I am entitled to an opinion and that opinion is that animal testing is unethical and inhumane. I believe there should be braver scientists out there who should test things on themselves. I know animal testing reduces the amount of human lives lost, but basing the use of animals in medicinal testing just because they are 'inferior' to us, is highly unacceptable. Animals are an important part of the ecosystem and should be treated nicely and almost like equals to humans."+
-''See [[Editorial news and tasks| Past editorial news and tasks]]'' | ''Follow recent edits and updates on [http://twitter.com/debatepedia Twitter]'' | ''See other [[Editing tasks|editing tasks]] you can do.''+<div style="margin:0;background:#6C8FB9;font-family:sans-serif;font-size:120%;font-weight:bold;border:1px solid #010101;text-align:left;color:#000;padding-left:0.4em;padding-top:0.2em;padding-bottom:0.2em;"> Editorial News and Notes </div>
-<div style="margin:0;background:#6C8FB9;font-family:sans-serif;font-size:120%;font-weight:bold;border:1px solid #010101;text-align:left;color:#000;padding-left:0.4em;padding-top:0.2em;padding-bottom:0.2em;"> Debates In The News </div>+This section features strong work done by Debatepedia editors. Consider joining their efforts. '''[[Debatepedia User Guide| User Guide]].'''
-*'''[[Debate: Enhanced interrogation techniques| Enhanced interrogation techniques]]:''' Following the killing of Osama bin Laden, with useful information obtained through interrogation techniques, some have argued that it was "enhanced interrogations" that lead to Osama bin Laden's death. This has lead to renewed debate over the practice. +*'''[[Debate: The New Deal| New Deal]] created historic public works and infrastructure.''' [http://www.slate.com/articles/news_and_politics/history_lesson/2011/10/new_deal_accomplishments_do_conservatives_who_attack_the_new_dea.html Michael Hiltzik. "What the new deal accomplished." Slate. Oct 13th, 2011]:[[Image:Person typing.gif|right|190px]] "The New Deal physically reshaped the country. To this day, Americans still rely on its works for transportation, electricity, flood control, housing, and community amenities. The output of one agency alone, the Works Progress Administration, represents a magnificent bequest to later generations. The WPA produced, among many other projects, 1,000 miles of new and rebuilt airport runways, 651,000 miles of highway, 124,000 bridges, 8,000 parks, and 18,000 playgrounds and athletic fields; some 84,000 miles of drainage pipes, 69,000 highway light standards, and 125,000 public buildings built, rebuilt, or expanded. Among the latter were 41,300 schools. The transformative power of this effort is inestimable."
-*'''[[Debate: Should the West arm Libyan rebels?| Should the West arm Libyan rebels?]] and [[Debate: No-fly zone over Libya| No-fly zone over Libya]]''' have been in the news big time since the conflict began in March. Debatepedia's resources are excellent on these topics. [[Image:Newstand.jpg|right|200px]] +
-*'''[[Debate: Nuclear energy| Nuclear energy]]''' rose into the limelight once again as a debate, following the Japanese earthquake and tsunami, which damaged over four nuclear power plants and threatened to cause a national and global nuclear fallout.[http://www.scrippsnews.com/node/60456]+
-*'''[[Debate: Birthright citizenship for children of illegal immigrants| Birthright citizenship for children of illegal immigrants]]''' US Republicans in Congress and in Arizona have been challenging birthright citizenship aggressively in early 2011, engaging a PR campaign on the topic and introducing legislation calling to end it.[http://blogs.wsj.com/law/2011/01/28/arizona-legislation-targets-birthright-citizenship/]+
-''[[Debates in the News| More Debates in the News]]'' +''See [[Editorial news and tasks| Past editorial news and tasks]]'' | ''Follow recent edits and updates on [http://twitter.com/debatepedia Twitter]'' | ''See other [[Editing tasks|editing tasks]] you can do.''
- +
-<div style="margin:0;background:#6C8FB9;font-family:sans-serif;font-size:120%;font-weight:bold;border:1px solid #010101;text-align:left;color:#000;padding-left:0.4em;padding-top:0.2em;padding-bottom:0.2em;"> The Global Debates Competition </div>+
-[[Image:The Global Debates Banner.jpg|right|300px]]+
-Debatepedia has developed resources for '''[http://theglobaldebates.org/ The 2010/2011 Global Debates]''', an online debate competition organized by the International Debate Education Association, in partnership with the UN Foundation and National Forensic League. Debatepedia's resources include a '''[[Global Debates Migration Portal]]''' as well as a pro/con article for the topic: '''[[Debate: UN Convention on the Rights of Migrant Workers and their Families| Ratification of the UN Convention on the Rights of Migrant Workers and their Families]].''' Interested high school students can register for the competition [http://theglobaldebates.org/take-action/register-for-the-global-debates/ here].+
<div style="margin:0;background:#6C8FB9;font-family:sans-serif;font-size:120%;font-weight:bold;border:1px solid #010101;text-align:left;color:#000;padding-left:0.4em;padding-top:0.2em;padding-bottom:0.2em;"> Category Browser </div> <div style="margin:0;background:#6C8FB9;font-family:sans-serif;font-size:120%;font-weight:bold;border:1px solid #010101;text-align:left;color:#000;padding-left:0.4em;padding-top:0.2em;padding-bottom:0.2em;"> Category Browser </div>
-Browse through Debatepedia's main categories to explore its contents and areas of interest to you. Go to Debatepedia's '''[[Main categories| Main categories]]''' to see all of its categories, portals, and other contents.+Browse through Debatepedia's main categories to explore its contents and areas of interest to you. Go to Debatepedia's '''[[Debatepedia:Contents| Contents Guide]]''' to see all of its categories.
-*'''[[Past Daily Debate Digest topics| Highest quality]] | [http://wiki.idebate.org/index.php/Special:Popularpages Most popular] | [http://wiki.idebate.org/index.php?title=Special%3AAllpages&from=Debate&namespace=0 All debate articles]''' +*'''[[Featured Debate Digest articles| Highest quality]]'''
-*'''[http://wiki.idebate.org/index.php?title=Special:Categories&amp;limit=500&amp;offset=0 All categories]+
*'''Featured portal: [[Global climate change debate portal|Climate change project]]''' *'''Featured portal: [[Global climate change debate portal|Climate change project]]'''
*'''[[:Category:Politics| Politics]] | [[:Category:Political systems| Political systems]] | [[:Category:International politics| International politics]]''' *'''[[:Category:Politics| Politics]] | [[:Category:Political systems| Political systems]] | [[:Category:International politics| International politics]]'''
-*'''[[:Category:Security| Security]] | [[:Category:Conflict| Conflict]] | [[:Category:War| War]] | [[:Category:Terrorism|Terrorism]]'''+*'''[[:Category:Security| Security]] | [[:Category:Conflict| Conflict]] | [[:Category:War| War]] | [[:Category:Terrorism|Terrorism]]'''[[Image:Earth.jpg|right|170px]]
*'''[[:Category:Morality| Morality]] | [[:Category:Religion| Religion]] | [[:Category:Life and death|Life and death]]''' *'''[[:Category:Morality| Morality]] | [[:Category:Religion| Religion]] | [[:Category:Life and death|Life and death]]'''
*'''[[:Category:Law| Law]] | [[:Category:Individual rights| Individual rights]] | [[:Category:Privacy|Privacy]] | [[:Category:Bans|Bans]]''' *'''[[:Category:Law| Law]] | [[:Category:Individual rights| Individual rights]] | [[:Category:Privacy|Privacy]] | [[:Category:Bans|Bans]]'''

Current revision

http://www.nflonline.org/

Debatepedia is the Wikipedia of debates - an encyclopedia of pro and con arguments and quotes on critical issues. A project of the 501c3 non-profit International Debate Education Association (IDEA), Debatepedia utilizes the same wiki technology powering Wikipedia to centralize arguments and quotes found in editorials, op-eds, political statements, and books into comprehensive pro/con articles. This helps citizens and decision-makers better deliberate on the world's most important questions. Debatepedia is endorsed by the National Forensic League.

The Debate Digest

Our latest and best pro/con articles to help you develop a position on the world's most important issues.

Featured pro and con arguments from this article:

  • PRO: Occupy protesters have common message to right capitalism "Cross continents." The Economist. Oct 17th 2011:
    "they do share a common demand: someone, somewhere, should do something to right the problems of global capitalism as currently constituted. One reason why these protests are so interesting is that their targets, those cheerleaders for globalisation, capitalism and free markets, tend to agree that the system needs fixing. This makes the 'occupy' protests, as they have come to be known in the English-speaking world, hard to argue against."
  • CON: Occupy protests lack common/coherent message. "Occupy protests need to focus on coherent demands." Student Life Staff Editorial. October 17th, 2011: "The protests have been linked and compared to the tea party movement, due to their similar grassroots nature and extreme ideological stances. However, the tea party does have a centralized message, which the “Occupy” protests lack.
    The tea party is about reducing taxes and cutting spending to make government smaller. Regardless of whether or not you agree with the tea party’s stances, it is possible to know what the entire group and all of its smaller subsidiaries are about. We believe the “Occupy” protests need to do the same thing. Define and convey their message correctly, and stick to reasonable demands that resonate with the rest of the American public. Most of the country has been seriously hurt by the financial crisis, and most of the American public wants to focus on creating a more equal and fair country. There is a lot of room for the “Occupy” protests to grow, but without a consistent message, most Americans will be turned off."
Recent Debate Digest articles

See Past Debate Digest topics

Debates In The News
  • Climate change and clean energy portal Probably one of Debatepedia's best resources, this portal is always timely.
  • Debate: Constitutionality of US health insurance mandates The Obama Administration and others are pushing for a final ruling from the Supreme Court on the constitutionality of the Affordable Care Act's mandate that Americans [with some exceptions] buy private health insurance.
  • Debate: UN recognition of Palestinian statehood is front and center in international news, as the Palestinian Authority pursues a high-profile UN vote in favor of statehood. A majority of UN member states appear to support their push. Yet, the US has promised to veto the move in the Security Council in support of its ally Israel.
  • Debate: American Jobs Act US President Obama submitted the American Jobs Act to Congress at a critical time in the nation's economic history. Debatepedia looks at the bill and the arguments from its supporters and detractors.

More Debates in the News

Editorial News and Notes

This section features strong work done by Debatepedia editors. Consider joining their efforts. User Guide.

  • New Deal created historic public works and infrastructure. Michael Hiltzik. "What the new deal accomplished." Slate. Oct 13th, 2011:
    "The New Deal physically reshaped the country. To this day, Americans still rely on its works for transportation, electricity, flood control, housing, and community amenities. The output of one agency alone, the Works Progress Administration, represents a magnificent bequest to later generations. The WPA produced, among many other projects, 1,000 miles of new and rebuilt airport runways, 651,000 miles of highway, 124,000 bridges, 8,000 parks, and 18,000 playgrounds and athletic fields; some 84,000 miles of drainage pipes, 69,000 highway light standards, and 125,000 public buildings built, rebuilt, or expanded. Among the latter were 41,300 schools. The transformative power of this effort is inestimable."

See Past editorial news and tasks | Follow recent edits and updates on Twitter | See other editing tasks you can do.

Category Browser

Browse through Debatepedia's main categories to explore its contents and areas of interest to you. Go to Debatepedia's Contents Guide to see all of its categories.

Problem with the site? 

Tweet a bug on bugtwits
.