Personal tools
 
Views

Welcome to Debatepedia!

From Debatepedia

(Difference between revisions)
Jump to: navigation, search
Revision as of 13:18, 28 June 2011 (edit)
Brooks Lindsay (Talk | contribs)

← Previous diff
Revision as of 13:19, 28 June 2011 (edit)
Brooks Lindsay (Talk | contribs)

Next diff →
Line 4: Line 4:
|colspan="2" width="45%" bgcolor="#F2F2F2" style="border:1px solid #BAC5FD;padding:.4em;padding-top:0.5em;"| |colspan="2" width="45%" bgcolor="#F2F2F2" style="border:1px solid #BAC5FD;padding:.4em;padding-top:0.5em;"|
[[Image:Nfl_logo_small.gif|right|34px|http://www.nflonline.org/]] [[Image:Nfl_logo_small.gif|right|34px|http://www.nflonline.org/]]
-'''Debatepedia is the Wikipedia of debates - an encyclopedia of pro and con arguments and quotes on critical issues around the world.''' A project of the 501c3 non-profit '''[http://www.idebate.org/ International Debate Education Association (IDEA)]''', Debatepedia utilizes the same wiki technology powering Wikipedia to engage you and other editors in centralizing arguments and quotes found in editorials, op-eds, books, and around the web into comprehensive pro/con articles. This helps citizens and decision-makers better deliberate on the world's most important questions. Debatepedia is endorsed by the [http://www.nflonline.org National Forensic League].+'''Debatepedia is the Wikipedia of debates - an encyclopedia of pro and con arguments and quotes on critical issues.''' A project of the 501c3 non-profit '''[http://www.idebate.org/ International Debate Education Association (IDEA)]''', Debatepedia utilizes the same wiki technology powering Wikipedia to engage you and other editors in centralizing arguments and quotes found in editorials, op-eds, books, and around the web into comprehensive pro/con articles. This helps citizens and decision-makers better deliberate on the world's most important questions. Debatepedia is endorsed by the [http://www.nflonline.org National Forensic League].
|- |-

Revision as of 13:19, 28 June 2011

http://www.nflonline.org/

Debatepedia is the Wikipedia of debates - an encyclopedia of pro and con arguments and quotes on critical issues. A project of the 501c3 non-profit International Debate Education Association (IDEA), Debatepedia utilizes the same wiki technology powering Wikipedia to engage you and other editors in centralizing arguments and quotes found in editorials, op-eds, books, and around the web into comprehensive pro/con articles. This helps citizens and decision-makers better deliberate on the world's most important questions. Debatepedia is endorsed by the National Forensic League.

The Debate Digest

Our latest and best pro/con articles to help you develop a position on the world's most important issues.

"Libya, War Powers Start White House, Congress on Collision Course." PBS Newshour. June 15th, 2011

Featured pro and con arguments from this article:

  • PRO: US action in Libya does not amount to hostilities/war Obama Administration letter to Congress justifying Libya engagement, June 15th, 2011: "The President is of the view that the current U.S. military operations in Libya are consistent with the War Powers Resolution and do not under that law require further congressional authorization, because U.S. military operations are distinct from the kind of 'hostilities' contemplated by the Resolution’s 60 day termination provision. U.S. forces are playing a constrained and supporting role in a multinational coalition, whose operations are both legitimated by and limited to the terms of a United Nations Security Council Resolution that authorizes the use of force solely to protect civilians and civilian populated areas under attack or threat of attack and to enforce a no-fly zone and an arms embargo. U.S. operations do not involve sustained fighting or active exchanges of fire with hostile forces, nor do they involve the presence of U.S. ground troops, U.S. casualties or a serious threat thereof, or any significant chance of escalation into a conflict characterized by those factors."
Recent Debate Digest articles

See Past Debate Digest topics

Debates In The News

More Debates in the News

Editorial News and Tasks

This section features strong work done by Debatepedia editors. Consider joining their efforts. User Guide. See Recent changes for all recent community edits.

England4Ever created and edited Debate: Aaland Islands.

See Past editorial news and tasks | Follow recent edits and updates on Twitter | See other editing tasks you can do.

Category Browser

Browse through Debatepedia's main categories to explore its contents and areas of interest to you. Go to Debatepedia's Main categories to see all of its categories, portals, and other contents.

Problem with the site? 

Tweet a bug on bugtwits
.