Personal tools
 
Views

Welcome to Debatepedia!

From Debatepedia

(Difference between revisions)
Jump to: navigation, search
Revision as of 01:29, 2 June 2011 (edit)
Brooks Lindsay (Talk | contribs)

← Previous diff
Revision as of 02:52, 4 June 2011 (edit)
Brooks Lindsay (Talk | contribs)

Next diff →
Line 59: Line 59:
This section features strong work done by Debatepedia editors. Consider joining their efforts. '''[[Debatepedia User Guide| User Guide]].''' See '''[http://wiki.idebate.org/index.php/Special:Recentchanges Recent changes]''' for all recent community edits. This section features strong work done by Debatepedia editors. Consider joining their efforts. '''[[Debatepedia User Guide| User Guide]].''' See '''[http://wiki.idebate.org/index.php/Special:Recentchanges Recent changes]''' for all recent community edits.
 +*'''June 3rd.''' A number of arguments were added to [[Debate: Safe injection sites for heroin addicts]] by Ikassamsha.
*'''June 1.''' [[Debate: Home plate collision rule in baseball]] on the Debate Digest. *'''June 1.''' [[Debate: Home plate collision rule in baseball]] on the Debate Digest.
*'''May 30th.''' Wingzero898 created [[Debate: Marriage under 18| Marriage under 18]]. *'''May 30th.''' Wingzero898 created [[Debate: Marriage under 18| Marriage under 18]].

Revision as of 02:52, 4 June 2011

http://www.nflonline.org/

Debatepedia is essentially the Wikipedia of debates. It is an encyclopedia of pro and con arguments and quotes. A project of the 501c3 non-profit International Debate Education Association (IDEA), Debatepedia utilizes the same wiki technology powering Wikipedia to engage you and other editors in centralizing arguments and quotes found in editorials, op-eds, books, and around the web into comprehensive pro/con articles. This helps citizens and decision-makers better deliberate on the world's most important questions. Debatepedia is endorsed by the National Forensic League.

The Debate Digest

Our latest and most refined pro/con articles to help you deliberate and develop a position on the world's most important issues.

"Buster Posey San Jose Giants Collision at home plate " on YouTube from 2009

Featured pro and con arguments from this article:

  • PRO: Home plate collisions are essential tension of offense/defense. Dave Cameron. "It's time to end home plate collisions." Fan Graphs. May 26th, 2011: "Rounding the bases, getting to home plate and putting a run on the board for your team is what the game of baseball is all about. A baserunner wants to get there at all costs, whereas a catcher wants to protect it at all costs. The mutual discomfort that's evoked in both the catcher and the baserunner as a play at the plate develops is one of the intriguing peculiarities that makes the game of baseball so great."
  • CON: Home plate collisions turn baseball players into gladiators. Dave Cameron. "It's time to end home plate collisions." Fan Graphs. May 26th, 2011: "I was a catcher in high school, and I was trained how to block the plate while trying to keep myself alive. High School isn’t MLB, but I still found myself in a few situations where a significantly larger player was barreling towards me at full speed, and I realized that I had to stop being a baseball player and start being a gladiator. It was ridiculous to me then and is ridiculous to me now. Millar is right – if you want to watch violent collisions, you can watch football. Or hockey. Or MMA. There’s no reason baseball needs to have similar kinds of plays; it’s an entirely different sport with a different premise and different rules."
Recent Debate Digest articles

See Past Debate Digest topics

Debates In The News
  • Return of Israel to pre-1967 borders US President Barack Obama said on May 19th that he was committed to the pre-1967 borders as a starting point for negotiations on the Palestinian-Israeli border, re-elevating the debate on the subject to center stage.NPR article on subject.
  • Enhanced interrogation techniques: Following the killing of Osama bin Laden, with useful information obtained through interrogation techniques, some have argued that it was "enhanced interrogations" that lead to Osama bin Laden's death. This has lead to renewed debate over the practice.
  • Should the West arm Libyan rebels? and No-fly zone over Libya have been in the news big time since the conflict began in March. Debatepedia's resources are excellent on these topics.
  • Nuclear energy rose into the limelight once again as a debate, following the Japanese earthquake and tsunami, which damaged over four nuclear power plants and threatened to cause a national and global nuclear fallout.[1]

More Debates in the News

Editorial News and Tasks

This section features strong work done by Debatepedia editors. Consider joining their efforts. User Guide. See Recent changes for all recent community edits.

See Past editorial news and tasks | Follow recent edits and updates on Twitter | See other editing tasks you can do.

Category Browser

Browse through Debatepedia's main categories to explore its contents and areas of interest to you. Go to Debatepedia's Main categories to see all of its categories, portals, and other contents.

Problem with the site? 

Tweet a bug on bugtwits
.