Personal tools
 
Views

User talk:DavidCary

From Debatepedia

(Difference between revisions)
Jump to: navigation, search
Revision as of 19:42, 30 June 2009 (edit)
Brooks Lindsay (Talk | contribs)

← Previous diff
Revision as of 21:13, 30 June 2009 (edit)
DavidCary (Talk | contribs)
(Welcome - Is there any way I could said that more clearly?)
Next diff →
Line 2: Line 2:
Hello, I reverted the article back to "Is climate change chiefly human caused?". Climate change is the appropriate term, and the formating of the title is generally better (space between "debate" and title. Is this what caused you to revert the article to "global warming"? -- [[User:Brooks Lindsay|Brooks Lindsay]] 14:42, 30 June 2009 (CDT) Hello, I reverted the article back to "Is climate change chiefly human caused?". Climate change is the appropriate term, and the formating of the title is generally better (space between "debate" and title. Is this what caused you to revert the article to "global warming"? -- [[User:Brooks Lindsay|Brooks Lindsay]] 14:42, 30 June 2009 (CDT)
 +
 +: ''what caused you to revert...?'' An incorrectly-spelled word in the title caused me to revert the article to the previous title, "[[Debate:Global warming, chiefly human-caused?]]". Is there any way I could have indicated that more clearly than what I wrote in the summary comment for that edit[http://wiki.idebate.org/index.php?title=Debate%3A_Is_climate_change_chiefly_human-caused%3F&diff=81065&oldid=75471]? --[[User:DavidCary|DavidCary]] 16:13, 30 June 2009 (CDT)

Revision as of 21:13, 30 June 2009

Welcome

Hello, I reverted the article back to "Is climate change chiefly human caused?". Climate change is the appropriate term, and the formating of the title is generally better (space between "debate" and title. Is this what caused you to revert the article to "global warming"? -- Brooks Lindsay 14:42, 30 June 2009 (CDT)

what caused you to revert...? An incorrectly-spelled word in the title caused me to revert the article to the previous title, "Debate:Global warming, chiefly human-caused?". Is there any way I could have indicated that more clearly than what I wrote in the summary comment for that edit[1]? --DavidCary 16:13, 30 June 2009 (CDT)

Problem with the site? 

Tweet a bug on bugtwits
.