Personal tools
 
Views

Talk:Debate: Criminalization of Holocaust denial

From Debatepedia

(Difference between revisions)
Jump to: navigation, search
Revision as of 23:30, 9 July 2009 (edit)
DharmaLion (Talk | contribs)
(does this article proceed from the presumption that the Holocaust happened or does it leave room for debate as to whether it happened or not?)
← Previous diff
Revision as of 20:29, 19 March 2010 (edit)
Brooks Lindsay (Talk | contribs)

Next diff →
Line 1: Line 1:
 +''Click on the "+" tab above to add a comment. Join us on [http://www.facebook.com/group.php?gid=19125768640&ref=search&sid=1402695.3804486936..1 Facebook] for broader community discussion.''
 +
 +==Anonymous comment ==
 +
I'm a bit confused by the following statement in the "Background and Context": '''It is assumed in this article that the Holocaust occurred and that Nazi government of Germany...'''. This is because further down there is a section entitled '''Do facts indicate, beyond a reasonable doubt, that the Holocaust occurred?''' where the underlying question of whether the Holocaust occurred is addressed. Most of the article does seem to take the well-accepted position that the Holocaust occurred and that this debate is between those who accept that the Holocaust happened but differ as to whether Holocaust denial is merely incorrect or also criminal. However this one section '''Do facts indicate, beyond a reasonable doubt, that the Holocaust occurred?''' seems to make a debate as to whether the Holocaust happened at all fair game. So I'm confused.--[[User:DharmaLion|DharmaLion]] 18:30, 9 July 2009 (CDT) I'm a bit confused by the following statement in the "Background and Context": '''It is assumed in this article that the Holocaust occurred and that Nazi government of Germany...'''. This is because further down there is a section entitled '''Do facts indicate, beyond a reasonable doubt, that the Holocaust occurred?''' where the underlying question of whether the Holocaust occurred is addressed. Most of the article does seem to take the well-accepted position that the Holocaust occurred and that this debate is between those who accept that the Holocaust happened but differ as to whether Holocaust denial is merely incorrect or also criminal. However this one section '''Do facts indicate, beyond a reasonable doubt, that the Holocaust occurred?''' seems to make a debate as to whether the Holocaust happened at all fair game. So I'm confused.--[[User:DharmaLion|DharmaLion]] 18:30, 9 July 2009 (CDT)

Revision as of 20:29, 19 March 2010

Click on the "+" tab above to add a comment. Join us on Facebook for broader community discussion.

Anonymous comment

I'm a bit confused by the following statement in the "Background and Context": It is assumed in this article that the Holocaust occurred and that Nazi government of Germany.... This is because further down there is a section entitled Do facts indicate, beyond a reasonable doubt, that the Holocaust occurred? where the underlying question of whether the Holocaust occurred is addressed. Most of the article does seem to take the well-accepted position that the Holocaust occurred and that this debate is between those who accept that the Holocaust happened but differ as to whether Holocaust denial is merely incorrect or also criminal. However this one section Do facts indicate, beyond a reasonable doubt, that the Holocaust occurred? seems to make a debate as to whether the Holocaust happened at all fair game. So I'm confused.--DharmaLion 18:30, 9 July 2009 (CDT)

Problem with the site? 

Tweet a bug on bugtwits
.