Resolved: That on balance, the No Child Left Behind Act of 2001 has improved academic achievement in the United States - Debatepedia

Welcome to Debatepedia! | About | Help | FAQ | Media Kit

Personal tools

	Views Special Page
Search Navigation Debatepedia Home IDEA Home Recent Changes Featured articles Upcoming features Contents guide getting started User Guide Create a debate Create an argument Pro/con structure Twitter Donate! Other resources Contact Internships Facebook group Useful links Link exchanges NFL resolution topics Other IDEA projects National Debate Series: Boston In other languages Toolbox Upload file Special pages	Debate Digest: Teacher-student friendships on Facebook, Law school, Balanced budget amendment, US debt ceiling deal. Resolved: That on balance, the No Child Left Behind Act of 2001 has improved academic achievement in the United States From Debatepedia (List of links) Jump to: navigation, search < Resolved: That on balance, the No Child Left Behind Act of 2001 has improved academic achievement in the United States The following pages link to Resolved: That on balance, the No Child Left Behind Act of 2001 has improved academic achievement in the United States: View (previous 50) (next 50) (20 \| 50 \| 100 \| 250 \| 500). Argument: No Child Left Behind encourages parents to engage more actively Argument: No Child Left Behind encourages teaching to the test Argument: No Child Left Behind has a narrow curriculum Argument: No-Child-Left-Behind detracts from the education of the gifted NFL resolution topics Debate: Resolved: That on balance, the No Child Left Behind Act of 2001 has improved academic achievement in the United States (redirect page) Argument: No Child Left Behind fosters accountability in public schools Argument: NCLB ensures disabled students are not left behind Argument: No Child Left Behind offers flexibility at state, local level Argument: No Child Left Behind offers choice to leave failing schools Argument: No Child Left Behind offers valuable measure of student progress Argument: NCLB standardized tests are a poor measure of school performance Argument: Facilitating military recruitment through NCLB is wrong Argument: NCLB raises standards and testing without improving education Argument: No Child Left Behind reveal nothing new about school performance Argument: No Child Left Behind over-emphasizes math and reading in curriculum Argument: Standardized tests poorly measure real student learning Argument: NCLB ridgedly punishes schools that are progressing, albeit slowly Argument: NCLB damages teacher morale, future of profession Argument: NCLB "pass" percentages poorly judge school progress Past featured IDEA projects View (previous 50) (next 50) (20 \| 50 \| 100 \| 250 \| 500). Retrieved from "http://dbp.idebate.org/en/index.php/Special:Whatlinkshere"

Problem with the site?

.