Debate Digest: Teacher-student friendships on Facebook, Law school, Balanced budget amendment, US debt ceiling deal.
Debate: Wave power
From Debatepedia
(List of links)
< Debate: Wave powerThe following pages link to Debate: Wave power:
View (previous 50) (next 50) (20 | 50 | 100 | 250 | 500).- Debate: Nuclear energy
- Featured Debate Digest articles
- Debate: Geothermal energy
- Debate: Hydroelectric dams
- Debate: Tidal energy
- Debate: "Clean coal"
- Debate: Natural gas
- Climate change and clean energy portal
- Argument: Wave power generators obstruct and are a hazard to fishers
- Argument: Wave generators degrade the pristine beauty of the environment
- Argument: Wave power can contribute a significant amount of energy
- Argument: Wave power is more consistent than other renewables
- Argument: Wave power will have a smaller impact than fossil fuel plants
- Argument: Oceans corrode wave power systems, which is costly
- Argument: Wave energy will become viable with greater economies of scales
- Argument: Wave power proposals will run up against permit regulations
- Argument: Wave power is a hazard to migrating fish and whales
- Argument: Wave power generators will not be placed in sensitive areas
- Argument: Electro-magnetic energy from wave power threatens marine life
- Argument: Wave power systems can attract predatory fish, damaging ecosystems
- Argument: Focus on energy conservation before wave power
- Argument: Diffuse wave energy requires many wave generators; high impact
- Argument: Wave energy more about profits than environment
- Argument: Marine life can avoid wave power systems/harm
- Argument: Wave generators provide beneficial surface for some sea life
- Argument: Wave power equipment can be moved if there are problems
- Argument: Waves pack potent energy compared to other renewables
- Argument: Wave power is young, years behind other renewables
- Argument: Wave power is too inconsistent
- Argument: Wave power systems have high initial capital costs
- Argument: Wave power is only viable where conditions are right
- Argument: Wave power will see resistance from coastal residents
- Argument: Difficult to transfer wave energy back to land
- Argument: Wave power systems are cheap to maintain
- Argument: Waves pack substantial energy; few wave generators are required
- Argument: Wave power diminishes wave quality for surfers
