Debate Digest: Teacher-student friendships on Facebook, Law school, Balanced budget amendment, US debt ceiling deal.
Debate: Catholic Church contraception policy
From Debatepedia
(List of links)
< Debate: Catholic Church contraception policyThe following pages link to Debate: Catholic Church contraception policy:
View (previous 50) (next 50) (20 | 50 | 100 | 250 | 500).- CIMB Group World Universities Peace Invitational Debate
- Featured Debate Digest articles
- Debate: Reducing value added tax on contraceptives
- Argument: Catholic Church's "natural family planning" is impractical/ineffective
- Argument: Evil (condoms) should not be used to fight evil (HIV/AIDS)
- Argument: Contraception undermines sexual morality; encourages promiscuity, infidelity
- Argument: Following divine law on contraceptives is hard but necessary
- Argument: Contraceptives protect married women from HIV-infected husbands
- Argument: Church contraception policy undermines moral obligation to protect life
- Argument: Condoms do not ensure against pregnancy, STDs, HIV/AIDS
- Argument: While not 100%-effective, condoms reduce risk of HIV-transmission
- Argument: Church policy against contraceptives worsens HIV/AID pandemic
- Argument: Condoms are needed where abstinence is not an option for women
- Argument: By encouraging sexual immorality, condoms increase risks of HIV/AIDS
- Argument: Sexual morality can/should go hand-in-hand with condom-use
- Argument: Church condom policies fail to adapt to harsh modern realities
- Argument: Priests need not promote condoms, but should not ban them
- Argument: Few support Catholic condom policy, undermining Church legitimacy
- Argument: Condoms prevent transmission of death, not merely transmission of life
- Argument: Catholics can support condoms as lesser evil than HIV/AIDS
- Argument: Condom-use is a responsible act of sexual maturity and prevention
- Argument: Contraception is an immoral approach to population control
- Argument: Contraceptives interrupt/demean the Godly act of creation
- Argument: Contraceptives violate God's commandment to "multiply"
- Argument: Life begins before the womb; contraceptives end budding life
- Argument: Church contraception policy focuses on saving souls not lives
- Argument: Abstinence 100% effective against pregnancy/STDs/HIV/AIDS
- Argument: Contraception wrongly aids in "spilling the seed"
- Argument: Church contraception policy properly based on faith not reason
- Argument: Life should form by God's will, not human birth control
- Argument: "Spilling seed" is not what God found wicked about Onan's acts
