Debate Digest: Teacher-student friendships on Facebook, Law school, Balanced budget amendment, US debt ceiling deal.

From Debatepedia

(Newest | Oldest) View (Newer 50) (Older 50) (20 | 50 | 100 | 250 | 500).

• 04:17, 11 March 2012 (hist) (diff) Argument: The Keystone XL pipeline contains significant risk of spills (→Opposing arguments) (top)
• 04:16, 11 March 2012 (hist) (diff) Argument: The Keystone XL pipeline contains significant risk of spills (→Opposing arguments)
• 04:04, 11 March 2012 (hist) (diff) Argument: Keystone XL will significantly increase greenhouse gas emissions (→Supporting quotations - Removing duplication) (top)
• 22:16, 10 March 2012 (hist) (diff) Argument: Keystone XL will significantly increase greenhouse gas emissions
• 21:25, 10 March 2012 (hist) (diff) Argument: The Keystone XL pipeline contains significant risk of spills
• 21:19, 10 March 2012 (hist) (diff) Argument: The Keystone XL pipeline contains significant risk of spills (→Supporting quotations)
• 21:19, 10 March 2012 (hist) (diff) Argument: The Keystone XL pipeline contains significant risk of spills
• 21:15, 10 March 2012 (hist) (diff) Debate: Keystone XL US-Canada oil pipeline (→Con - moving argument under the thesis. Cut and...) (top)
• 21:14, 10 March 2012 (hist) (diff) Debate: Keystone XL US-Canada oil pipeline
• 21:13, 10 March 2012 (hist) (diff) Debate: Keystone XL US-Canada oil pipeline (→Con)
• 21:01, 10 March 2012 (hist) (diff) Debate: Keystone XL US-Canada oil pipeline (→Pro)
• 15:16, 10 March 2012 (hist) (diff) Argument: Keystone XL will significantly increase greenhouse gas emissions
• 15:14, 10 March 2012 (hist) (diff) Argument: Keystone XL will significantly increase greenhouse gas emissions
• 15:12, 10 March 2012 (hist) (diff) Debate: Keystone XL US-Canada oil pipeline (→Con - Moving supporting evidence under the thesis)
• 14:19, 10 March 2012 (hist) (diff) Argument: Pipeline Oil spills are not so bad (→Supporting arguments) (top)
• 14:19, 10 March 2012 (hist) (diff) Argument: Pipeline Oil spills are not so bad (→Supporting arguments)
• 14:17, 10 March 2012 (hist) (diff) Argument: Pipeline Oil spills are not so bad (→Supporting arguments)
• 14:14, 10 March 2012 (hist) (diff) Argument: Pipeline Oil spills are not so bad
• 14:10, 10 March 2012 (hist) (diff) Debate: Keystone XL US-Canada oil pipeline (→Pro)
• 14:09, 10 March 2012 (hist) (diff) Debate: Keystone XL US-Canada oil pipeline (→Pro)
• 14:09, 10 March 2012 (hist) (diff) Debate: Keystone XL US-Canada oil pipeline (→Environment: Is the Keystone XL pipeline tolerable for the environment?)
• 04:58, 10 March 2012 (hist) (diff) Argument: Keystone XL crosses and jeopardizes sensitive environment (top)
• 04:45, 10 March 2012 (hist) (diff) Argument: Keystone XL crosses and jeopardizes sensitive environment
• 04:35, 10 March 2012 (hist) (diff) Debate: Keystone XL US-Canada oil pipeline (→Con)
• 02:42, 10 March 2012 (hist) (diff) Argument: Bad to create jobs with tar-sand-dependent Keystone XL (Past quote, add argument) (top)
• 02:41, 10 March 2012 (hist) (diff) Debate: Keystone XL US-Canada oil pipeline (→Economics: Is the pipeline economically vital? - moving the supporting argument under the thesis)
• 02:30, 10 March 2012 (hist) (diff) Talk:Debate: Keystone XL US-Canada oil pipeline (top)
• 16:51, 9 March 2012 (hist) (diff) Argument: Israel can fully deter and defend against Iran (top)
• 16:50, 9 March 2012 (hist) (diff) Argument: Israel can fully deter and defend against Iran
• 16:39, 9 March 2012 (hist) (diff) Argument: Iran is more concerned about self-defense than aggression (top)
• 16:31, 9 March 2012 (hist) (diff) Argument: Iran is more concerned about self-defense than aggression
• 16:31, 9 March 2012 (hist) (diff) Argument: Iran is more concerned about self-defense than aggression
• 16:22, 9 March 2012 (hist) (diff) Argument: Iran's military cannot project force in Middle East (top)
• 02:02, 6 March 2012 (hist) (diff) Debate: Performance of US President Barack Obama (→Did US President Barack Obama increase the debt too much) (top)
• 02:01, 6 March 2012 (hist) (diff) Debate: Performance of US President Barack Obama (→Write Subquestion here...)
• 04:45, 4 March 2012 (hist) (diff) Talk:Debate: Big government (→Needs clarification) (top)
• 04:23, 4 March 2012 (hist) (diff) Debate: Big government (→Con) (top)
• 04:18, 4 March 2012 (hist) (diff) Debate: Big government (→Con)
• 04:15, 4 March 2012 (hist) (diff) Talk:Debate: Big government
• 04:02, 4 March 2012 (hist) (diff) Debate: Big government (→Con)
• 03:30, 4 March 2012 (hist) (diff) Debate: Big government (→Con)
• 03:10, 4 March 2012 (hist) (diff) Talk:Argument: Big government invites corporate special interests (top)
• 18:58, 3 March 2012 (hist) (diff) Argument: Anomaly of "poor white Appalachian" less important than broad racism (→Supporting quotations) (top)
• 18:34, 3 March 2012 (hist) (diff) Argument: Affirmative action is only way to level playing field (→Counter-arguments - Shouldn't we just use the normal 2 column format for sub arguments?) (top)
• 16:33, 3 March 2012 (hist) (diff) Debate: Affirmative action (→Yes) (top)
• 19:32, 25 February 2012 (hist) (diff) Argument: "Under God" complies with separation of Church and State (top)
• 17:51, 25 February 2012 (hist) (diff) Debate: "Too big to fail" (→Pro) (top)
• 17:46, 25 February 2012 (hist) (diff) Debate: "Too big to fail"
• 17:17, 25 February 2012 (hist) (diff) Debate: The state should never support failing businesses (→Pro) (top)
• 17:11, 25 February 2012 (hist) (diff) Debate: "Too big to fail" (→External links and resources:)

(Newest | Oldest) View (Newer 50) (Older 50) (20 | 50 | 100 | 250 | 500).