|Revision as of 18:36, 7 September 2007 (edit)
Brooks Lindsay (Talk | contribs)
← Previous diff
|Revision as of 18:37, 7 September 2007 (edit)
Brooks Lindsay (Talk | contribs)
(→How do I get started with an account, editing, communicating with other users?)
Next diff →
|Line 11:||Line 11:|
|==How do I get started with an account, editing, communicating with other users?==||==How do I get started with an account, editing, communicating with other users?==|
|-||''See [[Debatepedia:Getting started (Tutorial)]]''||+||''See [[Debatepedia:Getting started (tutorial)]]''|
|==What are the rules governing Debatepedia?==||==What are the rules governing Debatepedia?==|
Revision as of 18:37, 7 September 2007
Debatepedia has many frequently asked questions. If you want to ask a question, and get an answer, feel free to go to the Debatepedia:Help Desk and post it there (and sign with at the end "~~~~" [you have to be logged in to do this]).
What are wikis?
Are wikis reliable as far as the quality of their content?
There is alot of debate over this point. Consider the case of Wikipedia as compared to encyclopedia Britannica in buttressing the argument that wikis are reliable and immensely more powerful than top-down editorial publications. A study in nature magazine in 2005 found that Wikipedia had an average of four errors per article while Britannica had an average of 3. Yet, Wikipedia's articles are much more extensive on average, and have citations out to sources. In addition, Wikipedia was approaching 2 million articles in English through 2007, while Britannica has only around 100,000. This has led many to the conclusion that Wikipedia is at least as reliable and more useful than Britannica. The primary reason for this is that Wikipedia, like Debatepedia, has very very strict rules. These rules are enforced by other users (ordinary people). It is the number of these users that write and enforce these rules and help improve Wikipedia that are its greatest strength and protection against someone, for example, coming onto the site and vandalizing it. So, one way to think of the reliability of a wiki is in considering the size and strength of its editorial base. Debatepedia intends to build such a base aggressively so as to gain the critical editorial mass that can enforce the rules, edit ferociously, and maintain reliability.
How do I get started with an account, editing, communicating with other users?
What are the rules governing Debatepedia?
Can I create new articles and debates?
Yes. Go to Debatepedia:Creating New Pages
Can I communicate with other users?
Yes, you can do this in a number of places. First, every article (debate or other) has a discussion page that you can access via the "discussion tab" at the top of the screen. Here, you can write comments that relate to improving the content on the article, and sign your comment by writing ~~~~, and other users can reply. Users can also communicate with each other on each other's user pages.
Do debate pages have discussion pages?
Yes. Every debate page on Debatepedia has a discussion Page.
Do I have a personal profile page?
Yes. Once you create an account on Debatepedia, you can click on your name listed at the top-right of the screen, which will take you to your "User Page", which you can turn into a personal profile page.
Can I track the activity on a debate or article of interest to me?
Yes. When on a debate page and logged in, click the "watch" tab. Now, you can go to "my watchlist" at the top right of the screen to view the subsequent editing activity on that page.