Debate Digest: Teacher-student friendships on Facebook, Law school, Balanced budget amendment, US debt ceiling deal.
Debate: US debt ceiling deal
From Debatepedia
(Difference between revisions)
Revision as of 16:22, 3 August 2011 (edit) Brooks Lindsay (Talk | contribs) (→Pro) ← Previous diff |
Revision as of 16:48, 3 August 2011 (edit) Brooks Lindsay (Talk | contribs) (→Con) Next diff → |
||
Line 35: | Line 35: | ||
*'''The debt deal does not cut spending enough.''' [http://www.ksallink.com/?cmd=displaystory&story_id=18486&format=html Jerry Moran, Sen R-KS. "Debt deal not good for America." KSALLink.com. August 2nd, 2011]: "This plan may be considered a good deal in Washington, D.C., but it is not a good deal for the future of America. There are virtually no spending cuts in this bill – in fact, it only slows slightly the growth of spending. The amount of spending that is reduced is about $21 billion next year. Given the fact that we borrow $4 billion more each day than what we take in – those savings will disappear in less than a week. It’s unfortunate the country has been through this long drama about raising the debt ceiling and it’s even sadder that the accomplishments are so few.” | *'''The debt deal does not cut spending enough.''' [http://www.ksallink.com/?cmd=displaystory&story_id=18486&format=html Jerry Moran, Sen R-KS. "Debt deal not good for America." KSALLink.com. August 2nd, 2011]: "This plan may be considered a good deal in Washington, D.C., but it is not a good deal for the future of America. There are virtually no spending cuts in this bill – in fact, it only slows slightly the growth of spending. The amount of spending that is reduced is about $21 billion next year. Given the fact that we borrow $4 billion more each day than what we take in – those savings will disappear in less than a week. It’s unfortunate the country has been through this long drama about raising the debt ceiling and it’s even sadder that the accomplishments are so few.” | ||
+ | *'''Debt deal cuts spending too early for recovery.''' [http://www.latimes.com/health/healthcare/la-fi-hiltzik-20110803,0,4502478.column Michael Hitzik. "Debt ceiling deal ignores real driver of deficits: healthcare costs." Los Angeles Times. August 2nd, 2011]: "The debt ceiling fight evaded the point that now is not the time to become preoccupied with limiting government spending, which is close to the only spending propping up a stagnant economy. It should not have escaped anyone's notice that the slowdown in the recovery reported last week, just as congressional pontificating kicked into high gear, coincided with the tailing off of government stimulus. Government layoffs are mounting, while private hiring hasn't materialized; the result is a sapping of consumer demand that will brake recovery even more." | ||
|- | |- | ||
|WRITE CONTENT FOR THE "Con" BOX ABOVE THIS CODE colspan="2" width="45%" bgcolor="#F2F2F2" style="border:1px solid #BAC5FD;padding:.4em;padding-top: 0.5em ;"| | |WRITE CONTENT FOR THE "Con" BOX ABOVE THIS CODE colspan="2" width="45%" bgcolor="#F2F2F2" style="border:1px solid #BAC5FD;padding:.4em;padding-top: 0.5em ;"| | ||
- | |||
- | |||
===Jobs: === | ===Jobs: === | ||
Revision as of 16:48, 3 August 2011
Was it an acceptable deal? What are the pros and cons? |
Background and context |
Arguments | |
Pro
|
Con
|
Jobs: | |
Pro |
Con
|
Pro/con sources | |
ProClick "edit" and write arguments here
|
Con
|
External links |