Debate Digest: Teacher-student friendships on Facebook, Law school, Balanced budget amendment, US debt ceiling deal.
Debate: US arms sales to Taiwan
From Debatepedia
(Difference between revisions)
Revision as of 01:35, 3 January 2010 (edit) Brooks Lindsay (Talk | contribs) (→Con) ← Previous diff |
Revision as of 01:35, 3 January 2010 (edit) Brooks Lindsay (Talk | contribs) (→Con) Next diff → |
||
Line 65: | Line 65: | ||
====Con==== | ====Con==== | ||
- | ''Click on the pencil icon and research and write arguments here'' | ||
- | |||
- | |||
- | |||
- | |||
+ | *'''Arms sales to Taiwan forces China to build up its defenses.''' Chinese Vice Premier Qian Qichen said in 2001: "To sell weapons to parts of the territory of another sovereign state, whether the weapons are defensive or offensive, won’t stand … The more weapons you sell, the more we will prepare ourselves in terms of our national defense. This is logical."[http://asianweek.com/2001_04_27/biz1_armssaletotaiwan.html] | ||
Revision as of 01:35, 3 January 2010
Should the US sell arms and war planes to Taiwan? |
|
Does Taiwanese possession of arms threaten China's "one China" policy? | |
ProClick on the pencil icon and research and write arguments here
|
Con
|
US Security: Are the arm sales in US interest? | |
ProClick on the pencil icon and research and write arguments here
|
Con
|
Write Subquestion here... | |
ProClick on the pencil icon and research and write arguments here
|
Con |
See alsoExternal links and resources |