Personal tools
 
Views

Debate: US arms sales to Taiwan

From Debatepedia

(Difference between revisions)
Jump to: navigation, search
Revision as of 01:15, 3 January 2010 (edit)
Brooks Lindsay (Talk | contribs)

← Previous diff
Revision as of 01:16, 3 January 2010 (edit)
Brooks Lindsay (Talk | contribs)

Next diff →
Line 53: Line 53:
|- |-
|WRITE CONTENT FOR THE "Con" BOX ABOVE THIS CODE colspan="2" width="45%" bgcolor="#F2F2F2" style="border:1px solid #BAC5FD;padding:.4em;padding-top: 0.5em ;"| |WRITE CONTENT FOR THE "Con" BOX ABOVE THIS CODE colspan="2" width="45%" bgcolor="#F2F2F2" style="border:1px solid #BAC5FD;padding:.4em;padding-top: 0.5em ;"|
-===Write Subquestion here...===+===US Security: Are the arm sales in US interest?===
|- |-
-|WRITE SUBQUESTION BETWEEN "=== ===" width="45%" bgcolor="#FFFAE0" style="border:1px solid #BAC5FD;padding:.4em;padding-top:0.5em;"|+|WRITE SUBQUESTION BETWEEN "=== ===" width="45%" bgcolor="#FFFAE0" style="border:1px solid #BAC5FD;padding:.4em;padding-top:0.5em;"|
 + 
====Pro==== ====Pro====
''Click on the pencil icon and research and write arguments here'' ''Click on the pencil icon and research and write arguments here''
Line 69: Line 70:
|WRITE CONTENT FOR THE "Pro" BOX ABOVE THIS CODE width="45%" bgcolor="#F2FAFB" style="border:1px solid #BAC5FD;padding:.4em;padding-top: 0.5em;"| |WRITE CONTENT FOR THE "Pro" BOX ABOVE THIS CODE width="45%" bgcolor="#F2FAFB" style="border:1px solid #BAC5FD;padding:.4em;padding-top: 0.5em;"|
-====Con====+====Con====
''Click on the pencil icon and research and write arguments here'' ''Click on the pencil icon and research and write arguments here''
Line 81: Line 82:
|- |-
|WRITE CONTENT FOR THE "Con" BOX ABOVE THIS CODE colspan="2" width="45%" bgcolor="#F2F2F2" style="border:1px solid #BAC5FD;padding:.4em;padding-top: 0.5em ;"| |WRITE CONTENT FOR THE "Con" BOX ABOVE THIS CODE colspan="2" width="45%" bgcolor="#F2F2F2" style="border:1px solid #BAC5FD;padding:.4em;padding-top: 0.5em ;"|
-===US Security: Are the arm sales in US interest?===+===Write Subquestion here...===
|- |-
-|WRITE SUBQUESTION BETWEEN "=== ===" width="45%" bgcolor="#FFFAE0" style="border:1px solid #BAC5FD;padding:.4em;padding-top:0.5em;"| +|WRITE SUBQUESTION BETWEEN "=== ===" width="45%" bgcolor="#FFFAE0" style="border:1px solid #BAC5FD;padding:.4em;padding-top:0.5em;"|
- +
====Pro==== ====Pro====
''Click on the pencil icon and research and write arguments here'' ''Click on the pencil icon and research and write arguments here''
Line 98: Line 98:
|WRITE CONTENT FOR THE "Pro" BOX ABOVE THIS CODE width="45%" bgcolor="#F2FAFB" style="border:1px solid #BAC5FD;padding:.4em;padding-top: 0.5em;"| |WRITE CONTENT FOR THE "Pro" BOX ABOVE THIS CODE width="45%" bgcolor="#F2FAFB" style="border:1px solid #BAC5FD;padding:.4em;padding-top: 0.5em;"|
-====Con==== +====Con====
''Click on the pencil icon and research and write arguments here'' ''Click on the pencil icon and research and write arguments here''

Revision as of 01:16, 3 January 2010

Should the US sell arms and war planes to Taiwan?

Background and context

The US has had a long-standing policy of selling arms to Taiwan. The Chinese government has fiercely opposed this policy, particularly because it goes against their One China policy, which aims to unify Taiwan with China. Are such arms sales still justified?

Contents

Does Taiwanese possession of arms threaten China's "one China" policy?

Pro

Click on the pencil icon and research and write arguments here





Con

Click on the pencil icon and research and write arguments here





US Security: Are the arm sales in US interest?

Pro

Click on the pencil icon and research and write arguments here





Con

Click on the pencil icon and research and write arguments here





Write Subquestion here...

Pro

Click on the pencil icon and research and write arguments here





Con

Click on the pencil icon and research and write arguments here





See also

External links and resources

Problem with the site? 

Tweet a bug on bugtwits
.