Personal tools
 
Views

Debate: US arms sales to Taiwan

From Debatepedia

(Difference between revisions)
Jump to: navigation, search
Revision as of 22:04, 16 December 2009 (edit)
Brooks Lindsay (Talk | contribs)

← Previous diff
Current revision (23:03, 1 April 2010) (edit)
Brooks Lindsay (Talk | contribs)

 
Line 2: Line 2:
|colspan="2" width="45%" bgcolor="#F2F2F2" style=""| |colspan="2" width="45%" bgcolor="#F2F2F2" style=""|
-===Write debate main question here...===+=== Should the US sell arms and war planes to Taiwan? ===
-|}+
- +
-{| style="width:100%; height:100px" border="0" align="center"+
-|__TOC__+
|} |}
Line 13: Line 9:
|bgcolor="#F7F7F7" colspan="2" style= "border:1px solid #BAC5FD"| |bgcolor="#F7F7F7" colspan="2" style= "border:1px solid #BAC5FD"|
-===Background and Context of Debate:===+=== Background and context ===
 +The US has had a long-standing policy of selling arms to Taiwan. The Chinese government has fiercely opposed this policy, particularly because it goes against their One China policy, which aims to unify Taiwan with China. The Obama administration has said that it will continue the policy, news that has been mostly welcomed in Taiwan and denounced in China. Here is a 2009 article on the Obama administration's policies: [http://www.nytimes.com/2009/12/16/world/asia/16taiwan.html Edward Wong. "Arms sales to Taiwan will proceed, US says." New York Times. December 15, 2009]. The question remains: are such arms sales still justified?
|} |}
 +
{| {|
|- |-
Line 22: Line 20:
|- |-
|colspan="2" width="45%" bgcolor="#F2F2F2" style="border:1px solid #BAC5FD;padding:.4em;padding-top:0.5em;"| |colspan="2" width="45%" bgcolor="#F2F2F2" style="border:1px solid #BAC5FD;padding:.4em;padding-top:0.5em;"|
 +=== Does Taiwanese possession of arms threaten China's "one China" policy? ===
-===Write Subquestion here...===+|-
 +|WRITE SUBQUESTION BETWEEN "=== ===" width="45%" bgcolor="#FFFAE0" style="border:1px solid #BAC5FD;padding:.4em;padding-top:0.5em;"|
-|- 
-|WRITE SUBQUESTION BETWEEN "=== ===" width="45%" bgcolor="#FFFAE0" style="border:1px solid #BAC5FD;padding:.4em;padding-top:0.5em;"| 
====Pro==== ====Pro====
-''Click on the pencil icon and research and write arguments here'' 
- 
- 
- 
- 
- 
 +*'''[[General statements for US arms sales to Taiwan]]''' White House official Raymond Burghardt, chairman of the American Institute in Taipei, which is the de facto United States Embassy in Taiwan, said in December of 2009 that arms sales to Taiwan will continue under the Obama administration, and that, "No one should be surprised when we move forward with them."[http://www.nytimes.com/2009/12/16/world/asia/16taiwan.html]
|WRITE CONTENT FOR THE "Pro" BOX ABOVE THIS CODE width="45%" bgcolor="#F2FAFB" style="border:1px solid #BAC5FD;padding:.4em;padding-top: 0.5em;"| |WRITE CONTENT FOR THE "Pro" BOX ABOVE THIS CODE width="45%" bgcolor="#F2FAFB" style="border:1px solid #BAC5FD;padding:.4em;padding-top: 0.5em;"|
 +====Con====
 +*'''Selling arms to Taiwan will encourage separatists there.''' Chinese Foreign Minister Tang Jiaxun urged the Bush administration to back off from selling arms to Taiwan. Tang said that selling weapons "would send a wrong signal to the Taiwanese authorities, and will encourage a very small number of people — the Taiwan independence elements — to continue to engage in separatist activities."[http://asianweek.com/2001_04_27/biz1_armssaletotaiwan.html]
-====Con====+*'''General statements against US arms sales to Taiwan.''' Chinese Foreign Ministry spokeswoman Jiang Yu said in December of 2009: "We are firmly opposed to U.S. arms sales to Taiwan."[http://www.nytimes.com/2009/12/16/world/asia/16taiwan.html]
-''Click on the pencil icon and research and write arguments here''+
- +
- +
- +
- +
- +
- +
- +
|- |-
|WRITE CONTENT FOR THE "Con" BOX ABOVE THIS CODE colspan="2" width="45%" bgcolor="#F2F2F2" style="border:1px solid #BAC5FD;padding:.4em;padding-top: 0.5em ;"| |WRITE CONTENT FOR THE "Con" BOX ABOVE THIS CODE colspan="2" width="45%" bgcolor="#F2F2F2" style="border:1px solid #BAC5FD;padding:.4em;padding-top: 0.5em ;"|
- +===US Security: Are the arm sales in US interest?===
-===Write Subquestion here...===+
|- |-
Line 70: Line 56:
====Con==== ====Con====
-''Click on the pencil icon and research and write arguments here'' 
- 
- 
- 
- 
 +*'''Arms sales to Taiwan forces China to build up its defenses.''' Chinese Vice Premier Qian Qichen said in 2001: "To sell weapons to parts of the territory of another sovereign state, whether the weapons are defensive or offensive, won’t stand … The more weapons you sell, the more we will prepare ourselves in terms of our national defense. This is logical."[http://asianweek.com/2001_04_27/biz1_armssaletotaiwan.html]
Line 81: Line 63:
|- |-
|WRITE CONTENT FOR THE "Con" BOX ABOVE THIS CODE colspan="2" width="45%" bgcolor="#F2F2F2" style="border:1px solid #BAC5FD;padding:.4em;padding-top: 0.5em ;"| |WRITE CONTENT FOR THE "Con" BOX ABOVE THIS CODE colspan="2" width="45%" bgcolor="#F2F2F2" style="border:1px solid #BAC5FD;padding:.4em;padding-top: 0.5em ;"|
-===Write Subquestion here...===+=== Pro/con sources ===
|- |-
-|WRITE SUBQUESTION BETWEEN "=== ===" width="45%" bgcolor="#FFFAE0" style="border:1px solid #BAC5FD;padding:.4em;padding-top:0.5em;"| +|WRITE SUBQUESTION BETWEEN "=== ===" width="45%" bgcolor="#FFFAE0" style="border:1px solid #BAC5FD;padding:.4em;padding-top:0.5em;"|
- +
====Pro==== ====Pro====
''Click on the pencil icon and research and write arguments here'' ''Click on the pencil icon and research and write arguments here''
Line 98: Line 79:
|WRITE CONTENT FOR THE "Pro" BOX ABOVE THIS CODE width="45%" bgcolor="#F2FAFB" style="border:1px solid #BAC5FD;padding:.4em;padding-top: 0.5em;"| |WRITE CONTENT FOR THE "Pro" BOX ABOVE THIS CODE width="45%" bgcolor="#F2FAFB" style="border:1px solid #BAC5FD;padding:.4em;padding-top: 0.5em;"|
-====Con==== +====Con====
-''Click on the pencil icon and research and write arguments here''+
- +
- +
- +
- +
Line 110: Line 86:
|- |-
|WRITE CONTENT FOR THE "Con" BOX ABOVE THIS CODE colspan="2" width="45%" bgcolor="#F2F2F2" style="border:1px solid #BAC5FD;padding:.4em;padding-top: 0.5em ;"| |WRITE CONTENT FOR THE "Con" BOX ABOVE THIS CODE colspan="2" width="45%" bgcolor="#F2F2F2" style="border:1px solid #BAC5FD;padding:.4em;padding-top: 0.5em ;"|
-===References:=== +==See also==
-|-+*[[Debate: US sale of F-16 fighter jets to Taiwan]]
-|colspan="2" width="45%" bgcolor="#F2F2F2" style="border:1px solid #BAC5FD;"|+==External links and resources==
-===Related pages on Debatepedia:===+*[http://debatewise.org/debates/1515-the-us-is-right-to-keep-on-selling-arms-to-taiwan Debatewise article on topic]
-|-+*[http://www.nytimes.com/2009/12/16/world/asia/16taiwan.html Edward Wong. "Arms sales to Taiwan will proceed, US says." New York Times. December 15, 2009]
-|colspan="2" width="45%" bgcolor="#F2F2F2" style="border:1px solid #BAC5FD;"| +
-===External links and resources:===+|}
- +[[Category:Underdeveloped debates]]
-|}+[[Category:Arms trade]]
 +[[Category:Taiwan]]
 +[[Category:United States]]
 +[[Category:US foreign policy]]
 +[[Category:US security]]
 +[[Category:China]]

Current revision

[Digg]
[reddit]
[Delicious]
[Facebook]

Should the US sell arms and war planes to Taiwan?

Background and context

The US has had a long-standing policy of selling arms to Taiwan. The Chinese government has fiercely opposed this policy, particularly because it goes against their One China policy, which aims to unify Taiwan with China. The Obama administration has said that it will continue the policy, news that has been mostly welcomed in Taiwan and denounced in China. Here is a 2009 article on the Obama administration's policies: Edward Wong. "Arms sales to Taiwan will proceed, US says." New York Times. December 15, 2009. The question remains: are such arms sales still justified?

[Edit]
[Delete Subquestion section]
[Add new subquestion section]
[Move subquestion section down]

Does Taiwanese possession of arms threaten China's "one China" policy?

[Add New]

Pro

  • General statements for US arms sales to Taiwan White House official Raymond Burghardt, chairman of the American Institute in Taipei, which is the de facto United States Embassy in Taiwan, said in December of 2009 that arms sales to Taiwan will continue under the Obama administration, and that, "No one should be surprised when we move forward with them."[1]


[Add New]

Con

  • Selling arms to Taiwan will encourage separatists there. Chinese Foreign Minister Tang Jiaxun urged the Bush administration to back off from selling arms to Taiwan. Tang said that selling weapons "would send a wrong signal to the Taiwanese authorities, and will encourage a very small number of people — the Taiwan independence elements — to continue to engage in separatist activities."[2]
  • General statements against US arms sales to Taiwan. Chinese Foreign Ministry spokeswoman Jiang Yu said in December of 2009: "We are firmly opposed to U.S. arms sales to Taiwan."[3]
[Edit]
[Delete Subquestion section]
[Add new subquestion section]
[Move subquestion section down]
[Move subquestion section up]

US Security: Are the arm sales in US interest?

[Add New]

Pro

Click on the pencil icon and research and write arguments here





[Add New]

Con

  • Arms sales to Taiwan forces China to build up its defenses. Chinese Vice Premier Qian Qichen said in 2001: "To sell weapons to parts of the territory of another sovereign state, whether the weapons are defensive or offensive, won’t stand … The more weapons you sell, the more we will prepare ourselves in terms of our national defense. This is logical."[4]


[Edit]
[Delete Subquestion section]
[Add new subquestion section]
[Move subquestion section up]

Pro/con sources

[Add New]

Pro

Click on the pencil icon and research and write arguments here





[Add New]

Con

See also

External links and resources

Problem with the site? 

Tweet a bug on bugtwits
.