Personal tools
 
Views

Debate: Should magazines digitally enhance their subjects?

From Debatepedia

(Difference between revisions)
Jump to: navigation, search
Revision as of 18:37, 4 June 2009 (edit)
Brooks Lindsay (Talk | contribs)
(Debate: Digital enhancement moved to Debate: Should magazines digitally enhance their subjects?)
← Previous diff
Current revision (12:22, 29 August 2010) (edit)
Lenkahabetinova (Talk | contribs)

 
Line 1: Line 1:
-{|style="font-size:100%; border:1px solid #BAC5FD; " cellpadding="0" 
- 
-|colspan="2" width="45%" bgcolor="#F2F2F2" style=""| 
-===Should Digital Enhancement be Banned in Magazines and Advertisements? === 
- 
-|} 
- 
-{| style="width:100%; height:100px" border="0" align="center" 
-|__TOC__ 
-|} 
- 
{|style="font-size:100%; padding:.4em;padding-top:0.5em;" cellpadding="5" {|style="font-size:100%; padding:.4em;padding-top:0.5em;" cellpadding="5"
|- |-
|bgcolor="#F7F7F7" colspan="2" style= "border:1px solid #BAC5FD"| |bgcolor="#F7F7F7" colspan="2" style= "border:1px solid #BAC5FD"|
-===Background and Context of Debate:===+===Background and context ===
 + 
 +Magazines are increasingly digitally enhancing their subjects, particularly enhancing certain elements of their human figure (ie, their breasts, the buttocks, the shape of their jaw, and in various other ways). Is this justified?
|} |}
Line 110: Line 101:
|- |-
|WRITE CONTENT FOR THE "NO" BOX ABOVE THIS CODE colspan="2" width="45%" bgcolor="#F2F2F2" style="border:1px solid #BAC5FD;padding:.4em;padding-top: 0.5em ;"| |WRITE CONTENT FOR THE "NO" BOX ABOVE THIS CODE colspan="2" width="45%" bgcolor="#F2F2F2" style="border:1px solid #BAC5FD;padding:.4em;padding-top: 0.5em ;"|
-===References:=== +==See also==
-|-+*[[Debate: Portrayal of women in mass media]]
-|colspan="2" width="45%" bgcolor="#F2F2F2" style="border:1px solid #BAC5FD;"|+==External links and resources==
-===Related pages on Debatepedia:===+
-|-+
-|colspan="2" width="45%" bgcolor="#F2F2F2" style="border:1px solid #BAC5FD;"| +
-===External links and resources:===+|}
- +[[Category:Magazines]]
-|}+[[Category:Technology]]
 +[[Category:Beauty]]
 +[[Category:Culture]]
 +[[Category:Digital enhancement]]
 +[[Category:Media]]
 +[[Category:Journalism]]

Current revision

[Digg]
[reddit]
[Delicious]
[Facebook]

Background and context

Magazines are increasingly digitally enhancing their subjects, particularly enhancing certain elements of their human figure (ie, their breasts, the buttocks, the shape of their jaw, and in various other ways). Is this justified?

[Edit]
[Delete Subquestion section]
[Add new subquestion section]

Write Subquestion here...

[Add New]

Yes

Click on the pencil icon and research and write arguments here





[Add New]

No

Click on the pencil icon and research and write arguments here





[Edit]
[Delete Subquestion section]
[Add new subquestion section]
[Move subquestion section down]
[Move subquestion section up]

Write Subquestion here...

[Add New]

Yes

Click on the pencil icon and research and write arguments here





[Add New]

No

Click on the pencil icon and research and write arguments here





[Edit]
[Delete Subquestion section]
[Add new subquestion section]
[Move subquestion section up]

Write Subquestion here...

[Add New]

Yes

Click on the pencil icon and research and write arguments here





[Add New]

No

Click on the pencil icon and research and write arguments here





See also

External links and resources

Problem with the site? 

Tweet a bug on bugtwits
.