Personal tools
 
Views

Debate: Should Wikipedia move toward inclusionist or deletionist principles?

From Debatepedia

(Difference between revisions)
Jump to: navigation, search
Revision as of 23:21, 19 March 2008 (edit)
Brooks Lindsay (Talk | contribs)
(External links and resources:)
← Previous diff
Current revision (17:13, 26 December 2009) (edit)
Lenkahabetinova (Talk | contribs)
(design changes, ToC)
 
Line 1: Line 1:
-{|style="font-size:100%; border:1px solid #BAC5FD; " cellpadding="0"+{|style="font-size:100%; padding:.4em;padding-top:0.5em;" cellpadding="5"
- +|-
-|colspan="2" width="45%" bgcolor="#F2F2F2" style=""|+|bgcolor="#F7F7F7" colspan="2" style= "border:1px solid #BAC5FD"|
-===Should Wikipedia include all of human knowledge or only the important, selective parts? ===+===Should Wikipedia move toward inclusionist or deletionist principles?===
-|}+
- +
-{| style="width:100%; height:100px" border="0" align="center"+
-|__TOC__+
|} |}
Line 12: Line 8:
|- |-
|bgcolor="#F7F7F7" colspan="2" style= "border:1px solid #BAC5FD"| |bgcolor="#F7F7F7" colspan="2" style= "border:1px solid #BAC5FD"|
-===Background and Context of Debate:===+ 
 +===Background and context ===
 + 
 +[http://www.economist.com/printedition/displaystory.cfm?story_id=10789354&logout=Y "The battle for Wikipedia's soul." Economist.com. Mar 6th 2008] - "The internet: The popular online encyclopedia, written by volunteer contributors, has unlimited space. So does it matter if it includes trivia?
 + 
 +"IT IS the biggest encyclopedia in history and the most successful example of “user-generated content” on the internet, with over 9m articles in 250 languages contributed by volunteers collaborating online. But Wikipedia is facing an identity crisis as it is torn between two alternative futures. It can either strive to encompass every aspect of human knowledge, no matter how trivial; or it can adopt a more stringent editorial policy and ban articles on trivial subjects, in the hope that this will enhance its reputation as a trustworthy and credible reference source. These two conflicting visions are at the heart of a bitter struggle inside Wikipedia between “inclusionists”, who believe that applying strict editorial criteria will dampen contributors' enthusiasm for the project, and “deletionists” who argue that Wikipedia should be more cautious and selective about its entries."
|} |}
 +
 +{| style="width:100%; height:100px" border="0" align="center"
 +|__TOC__
 +|}
 +
{| {|
|- |-
Line 21: Line 27:
|- |-
|colspan="2" width="45%" bgcolor="#F2F2F2" style="border:1px solid #BAC5FD;padding:.4em;padding-top:0.5em;"| |colspan="2" width="45%" bgcolor="#F2F2F2" style="border:1px solid #BAC5FD;padding:.4em;padding-top:0.5em;"|
- 
===Write Subquestion here...=== ===Write Subquestion here...===
Line 63: Line 68:
|- |-
|WRITE CONTENT FOR THE "NO" BOX ABOVE THIS CODE colspan="2" width="45%" bgcolor="#F2F2F2" style="border:1px solid #BAC5FD;padding:.4em;padding-top: 0.5em ;"| |WRITE CONTENT FOR THE "NO" BOX ABOVE THIS CODE colspan="2" width="45%" bgcolor="#F2F2F2" style="border:1px solid #BAC5FD;padding:.4em;padding-top: 0.5em ;"|
-===References:=== +==See also==
-|-+==External links and resources==
-|colspan="2" width="45%" bgcolor="#F2F2F2" style="border:1px solid #BAC5FD;"|+
-===Related pages on Debatepedia:===+
-|-+
-|colspan="2" width="45%" bgcolor="#F2F2F2" style="border:1px solid #BAC5FD;"| +
- +
-===External links and resources:===+
- +
|} |}
Line 77: Line 75:
[[Category:Underdeveloped debates]] [[Category:Underdeveloped debates]]
[[Category:Internet]] [[Category:Internet]]
-[[Category:Philosophy]]+[[Category:Wikis]]

Current revision

[Digg]
[reddit]
[Delicious]
[Facebook]

Should Wikipedia move toward inclusionist or deletionist principles?

Background and context

"The battle for Wikipedia's soul." Economist.com. Mar 6th 2008 - "The internet: The popular online encyclopedia, written by volunteer contributors, has unlimited space. So does it matter if it includes trivia?

"IT IS the biggest encyclopedia in history and the most successful example of “user-generated content” on the internet, with over 9m articles in 250 languages contributed by volunteers collaborating online. But Wikipedia is facing an identity crisis as it is torn between two alternative futures. It can either strive to encompass every aspect of human knowledge, no matter how trivial; or it can adopt a more stringent editorial policy and ban articles on trivial subjects, in the hope that this will enhance its reputation as a trustworthy and credible reference source. These two conflicting visions are at the heart of a bitter struggle inside Wikipedia between “inclusionists”, who believe that applying strict editorial criteria will dampen contributors' enthusiasm for the project, and “deletionists” who argue that Wikipedia should be more cautious and selective about its entries."

Contents

[Edit]
[Delete Subquestion section]
[Add new subquestion section]
[Move subquestion section down]

Write Subquestion here...

[Add New]

Yes

Click on the pencil icon and research and write arguments here

[Add New]

No

Click on the pencil icon and research and write arguments here

[Edit]
[Delete Subquestion section]
[Add new subquestion section]
[Move subquestion section down]
[Move subquestion section up]

Write Subquestion here...

[Add New]

Yes

Click on the pencil icon and research and write arguments here

[Add New]

No

Click on the pencil icon and research and write arguments here

[Edit]
[Delete Subquestion section]
[Add new subquestion section]
[Move subquestion section up]

Write Subquestion here...

[Add New]

Yes

Click on the pencil icon and research and write arguments here

[Add New]

No

Click on the pencil icon and research and write arguments here

See also

External links and resources

Problem with the site? 

Tweet a bug on bugtwits
.