Personal tools
 
Views

Debate: Should Japan abandon its nuclear power plants?

From Debatepedia

Revision as of 01:56, 28 March 2011; Myclob (Talk | contribs)
(diff) ←Older revision | Current revision | Newer revision→ (diff)
Jump to: navigation, search

Should Japan abandon its nuclear power plants?

Should Japan abandon its nuclear power plants?

Contents

Background and Context of Debate:

Write Subquestion here...

Pro

Click "edit" and write arguments here





Con

Less than 57 people died directly from the Chernobyl disaster, and it had a meltdown that burned for months. The worst that happened was some increase in thyroid cancer, which is very treatable, and can be prevented with iodine pills. No one was injured that lived more than 10 miles from it. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chernobyl_disaster#Assessing_the_disaster.27s_effects_on_human_health. Japan is no where as bad as Chernobyl. Instead of abandoning it, they need to do the opposite. They need to man up, and send every cement truck they have in the country, to contain it, and any water that might run off from it. The whole world should send brave men who don't want to live any more, to volunteer to help it from being worse.





Write Subquestion here...

Pro

Click "edit" and write arguments here





Con

Click "edit" and write arguments here





Write Subquestion here...

Pro

Click "edit" and write arguments here





Con

Click "edit" and write arguments here





References:

Related pages on Debatepedia:

External links and resources:

Problem with the site? 

Tweet a bug on bugtwits
.