Personal tools
 
Views

Debate: Mandatory drug tests of welfare recipients

From Debatepedia

(Difference between revisions)
Jump to: navigation, search
Revision as of 00:34, 29 December 2008 (edit)
Riamia2724 (Talk | contribs)
(Write Subquestion here...)
← Previous diff
Current revision (15:05, 26 April 2011) (edit)
Neek keeN (Talk | contribs)

 
Line 3: Line 3:
|colspan="2" width="45%" bgcolor="#F2F2F2" style=""| |colspan="2" width="45%" bgcolor="#F2F2F2" style=""|
=== Should welfare recipients be forced to take mandatory drug tests? === === Should welfare recipients be forced to take mandatory drug tests? ===
-|} 
- 
-{| style="width:100%; height:100px" border="0" align="center" 
-|__TOC__ 
|} |}
Line 12: Line 8:
|- |-
|bgcolor="#F7F7F7" colspan="2" style= "border:1px solid #BAC5FD"| |bgcolor="#F7F7F7" colspan="2" style= "border:1px solid #BAC5FD"|
-===Background and Context of Debate:===+===Background and context ===
 + 
 +Long a controversy in the United States, this debate centers around, on the proposition, the idea that welfare recipients should be subject to drug tests to ensure they are fitting to receive taxpayer money, and, on the opposition, the idea that this idea will only limit welfare for people in need, whether on drugs or not. And, the question of light drug use, or drug-use for medical or psychological comes into play as a potential "legitimate" use of drugs that could conflict with the need for welfare.
|} |}
Line 27: Line 25:
|WRITE SUBQUESTION BETWEEN "=== ===" width="45%" bgcolor="#FFFAE0" style="border:1px solid #BAC5FD;padding:.4em;padding-top:0.5em;"| |WRITE SUBQUESTION BETWEEN "=== ===" width="45%" bgcolor="#FFFAE0" style="border:1px solid #BAC5FD;padding:.4em;padding-top:0.5em;"|
-====Yes====+====Yes====
 +The fourth amendment says "unreasonable search and seizure" it is NOT unreasonable to search if someone is giving you something. For instance, if a bank was giving you a loan, it would be quite reasonable for them search your credit history. If tax payers are going to pay your income then it would seem quite reasonable that they know they are not paying to support someones drug or alcohol addicition, while their children starve.
 + 
''Click on the pencil icon and research and write arguments here'' ''Click on the pencil icon and research and write arguments here''
Line 38: Line 38:
|WRITE CONTENT FOR THE "YES" BOX ABOVE THIS CODE width="45%" bgcolor="#F2FAFB" style="border:1px solid #BAC5FD;padding:.4em;padding-top: 0.5em;"| |WRITE CONTENT FOR THE "YES" BOX ABOVE THIS CODE width="45%" bgcolor="#F2FAFB" style="border:1px solid #BAC5FD;padding:.4em;padding-top: 0.5em;"|
- 
====No==== ====No====
-''Click on the pencil icon and research and write arguments here''+*'''Mandatory drug testing violates the Fourth Amendment.''' The Fourth Amendment protects against unreasonable search and seizure, and because mandatory drug testing is considered a search, it should be proven necessary for public safety before it is undertaken.[http://www.aclu.org/drugpolicy/testing/10757res20030415.html#_edn6]
- +
- +
- +
- +
- +
Line 108: Line 102:
|- |-
|WRITE CONTENT FOR THE "NO" BOX ABOVE THIS CODE colspan="2" width="45%" bgcolor="#F2F2F2" style="border:1px solid #BAC5FD;padding:.4em;padding-top: 0.5em ;"| |WRITE CONTENT FOR THE "NO" BOX ABOVE THIS CODE colspan="2" width="45%" bgcolor="#F2F2F2" style="border:1px solid #BAC5FD;padding:.4em;padding-top: 0.5em ;"|
-===References:=== +===Is urinalysis the most effective means of detecting drugs?===
 + 
|- |-
-|colspan="2" width="45%" bgcolor="#F2F2F2" style="border:1px solid #BAC5FD;"|+|width="45%" bgcolor="#FFFAE0" style="border:1px solid #BAC5FD;padding:.4em;padding-top:0.5em;"|
 +====Yes====
 + 
 +|width="45%" bgcolor="#F2FAFB" style="border:1px solid #BAC5FD;padding:.4em;padding-top:0.5em;"|
 + 
 +====No====
-*[http://www.aclu.org/drugpolicy/index.html"Welfare Drug Testing." American Civil Liberties Union. 15 Apr 2003. Path: Drug Testing.] 
-*[http://www.aclu.org/drugpolicy/testing/34822res20080408.html "Drug Testing of Public Assistance Recipients as a Condition of Eligibility." American Civil Liberties Union. 8 Apr 2003.] 
-===Related pages on Debatepedia:=== 
|- |-
-|colspan="2" width="45%" bgcolor="#F2F2F2" style="border:1px solid #BAC5FD;"| +|colspan="2" width="45%" bgcolor="#f2f2f2" style="border:1px solid #BAC5FD;padding:.4em;padding-top:0.5em;"|
-===External links and resources:===+===Pro/con resources===
 +|-
 +|width="45%" bgcolor="#FFFAE0" style="border:1px solid #BAC5FD;padding:.4em;padding-top:0.5em;"|
 +====Yes====
 +*[http://www.stpete.usf.edu/hhl/papers/drug.testing.htm Hugh LaFollette "Mandatory drug testing" Drugs, Morality, and the Law, Garland Press, 1994, 283-99.]
-|}+ 
 +|width="45%" bgcolor="#F2FAFB" style="border:1px solid #BAC5FD;padding:.4em;padding-top:0.5em;"|
 +====No====
 + 
 + 
 +|-
 +|colspan="2" width="45%" bgcolor="#F2F2F2" style="border:1px solid #BAC5FD;padding:.4em;padding-top:0.5em;"|
 +==See also==
 +*[[Debate: Welfare drug testing]]
 +==External links==
 +*[http://www.aclu.org/drugpolicy/index.html"Welfare Drug Testing." American Civil Liberties Union. 15 Apr 2003. Path: Drug Testing.]
 +*[http://www.aclu.org/drugpolicy/testing/34822res20080408.html "Drug Testing of Public Assistance Recipients as a Condition of Eligibility." American Civil Liberties Union. 8 Apr 2003.]
 + 
 + 
 +[[Category:Drug testing]]
 +[[Category:Drugs]]
 +[[Category:Welfare]]

Current revision

[Digg]
[reddit]
[Delicious]
[Facebook]

Should welfare recipients be forced to take mandatory drug tests?

Background and context

Long a controversy in the United States, this debate centers around, on the proposition, the idea that welfare recipients should be subject to drug tests to ensure they are fitting to receive taxpayer money, and, on the opposition, the idea that this idea will only limit welfare for people in need, whether on drugs or not. And, the question of light drug use, or drug-use for medical or psychological comes into play as a potential "legitimate" use of drugs that could conflict with the need for welfare.

[Edit]
[Delete Subquestion section]
[Add new subquestion section]
[Move subquestion section down]

Is random drug testing of welfare recipients constitutional?

[Add New]

Yes

The fourth amendment says "unreasonable search and seizure" it is NOT unreasonable to search if someone is giving you something. For instance, if a bank was giving you a loan, it would be quite reasonable for them search your credit history. If tax payers are going to pay your income then it would seem quite reasonable that they know they are not paying to support someones drug or alcohol addicition, while their children starve.

Click on the pencil icon and research and write arguments here





[Add New]

No

  • Mandatory drug testing violates the Fourth Amendment. The Fourth Amendment protects against unreasonable search and seizure, and because mandatory drug testing is considered a search, it should be proven necessary for public safety before it is undertaken.[1]


[Edit]
[Delete Subquestion section]
[Add new subquestion section]
[Move subquestion section down]
[Move subquestion section up]

Is random drug testing of welfare recipients cost-effective?

[Add New]

Yes

Click on the pencil icon and research and write arguments here





[Add New]

No

Click on the pencil icon and research and write arguments here





[Edit]
[Delete Subquestion section]
[Add new subquestion section]
[Move subquestion section down]
[Move subquestion section up]

Would the practice stigmatize welfare recipients?

[Add New]

Yes

Click on the pencil icon and research and write arguments here





[Add New]

No

Click on the pencil icon and research and write arguments here





[Edit]
[Delete Subquestion section]
[Add new subquestion section]
[Move subquestion section down]
[Move subquestion section up]

Is urinalysis the most effective means of detecting drugs?

[Add New]

Yes

[Add New]

No

[Edit]
[Delete Subquestion section]
[Add new subquestion section]
[Move subquestion section up]

Pro/con resources

[Add New]

Yes


[Add New]

No

See also

External links

Problem with the site? 

Tweet a bug on bugtwits
.