Personal tools
 
Views

Debate: Literal interpretation of the Bible

From Debatepedia

(Difference between revisions)
Jump to: navigation, search
Revision as of 16:42, 24 March 2010 (edit)
Brooks Lindsay (Talk | contribs)

← Previous diff
Current revision (11:57, 19 April 2011) (edit)
England4ever (Talk | contribs)
(See also)
 
Line 62: Line 62:
|WRITE CONTENT FOR THE "NO" BOX ABOVE THIS CODE colspan="2" width="45%" bgcolor="#F2F2F2" style="border:1px solid #BAC5FD;padding:.4em;padding-top: 0.5em ;"| |WRITE CONTENT FOR THE "NO" BOX ABOVE THIS CODE colspan="2" width="45%" bgcolor="#F2F2F2" style="border:1px solid #BAC5FD;padding:.4em;padding-top: 0.5em ;"|
==See also== ==See also==
- +[[Debate: Biblical inerrancy]]
==External links and resources== ==External links and resources==

Current revision

[Digg]
[reddit]
[Delicious]
[Facebook]

Should the Bible be literally interpreted?

Background and context

Many believe in interpreting the text of the Bible literally. Is this possible, consistent, and generally reasonable in modern society?


[Edit]
[Delete Subquestion section]
[Add new subquestion section]
[Move subquestion section down]

Can the Bible be interpreted literally?

[Add New]

Yes

Click on the pencil icon and research and write arguments here

[Add New]

No

Click on the pencil icon and research and write arguments here

[Edit]
[Delete Subquestion section]
[Add new subquestion section]
[Move subquestion section down]
[Move subquestion section up]

Write Subquestion here...

[Add New]

Yes

Click on the pencil icon and research and write arguments here

[Add New]

No

Click on the pencil icon and research and write arguments here

[Edit]
[Delete Subquestion section]
[Add new subquestion section]
[Move subquestion section up]

Write Subquestion here...

[Add New]

Yes

Click on the pencil icon and research and write arguments here

[Add New]

No

Click on the pencil icon and research and write arguments here

See also

Debate: Biblical inerrancy

External links and resources

Problem with the site? 

Tweet a bug on bugtwits
.