Personal tools
 
Views

Debate: Liquid nitrogen economy

From Debatepedia

(Difference between revisions)
Jump to: navigation, search
Revision as of 01:56, 3 October 2009 (edit)
Renergy (Talk | contribs)
(repeating an argument found on a sisterly debate)
← Previous diff
Current revision (06:41, 3 October 2009) (edit)
Renergy (Talk | contribs)
(removing from Nitrogen category)
 
Line 113: Line 113:
[[Category:Energy]] [[Category:Energy]]
-[[Category:Nitrogen]] 
[[Category:Climate change]] [[Category:Climate change]]
[[Category:Green energy]] [[Category:Green energy]]

Current revision

[Digg]
[reddit]
[Delicious]
[Facebook]

Is a liquid nitrogen economy a good idea? How does it compare to liquid hydrogen?

Background and context

[Edit]
[Delete Subquestion section]
[Add new subquestion section]
[Move subquestion section down]

Is Liquid nitrogen conceivable as an automotive fuel?

[Add New]

Yes

Click on the pencil icon and research and write arguments here





[Add New]

No

  • Liquid Nitrogen has too low volumetric energy density to be used as automotive fuel. - Experiments with LN2 powered cars (Cryocar, CoolN2 car) have shown that LN2 cannot be considered a viable fuel for automotive applications (except for small carts/short range applications).





[Edit]
[Delete Subquestion section]
[Add new subquestion section]
[Move subquestion section down]
[Move subquestion section up]

Write Subquestion here...

[Add New]

Yes

Click on the pencil icon and research and write arguments here





[Add New]

No

Click on the pencil icon and research and write arguments here





[Edit]
[Delete Subquestion section]
[Add new subquestion section]
[Move subquestion section up]

Write Subquestion here...

[Add New]

Yes

Click on the pencil icon and research and write arguments here





[Add New]

No

Click on the pencil icon and research and write arguments here





See also

External links

Problem with the site? 

Tweet a bug on bugtwits
.