Personal tools
 
Views

Debate: Libertarianism

From Debatepedia

(Difference between revisions)
Jump to: navigation, search
Revision as of 15:11, 13 May 2008 (edit)
Jonathan Winterfield (Talk | contribs)
(Debate:Libertarianism)
← Previous diff
Revision as of 15:13, 13 May 2008 (edit)
Jonathan Winterfield (Talk | contribs)
(No)
Next diff →
Line 53: Line 53:
====No==== ====No====
*'''Making all government interaction voluntary would cause a huge increase in crime'''. All criminals would choose not to interact with government, and, as a result, no one is preventing them from committing crimes. *'''Making all government interaction voluntary would cause a huge increase in crime'''. All criminals would choose not to interact with government, and, as a result, no one is preventing them from committing crimes.
 +*'''People can not always be trusted to make the right choices'''. Without compulsory government, it would be down to individuals to make the right choices. As some people do not make the right choices, this would result in a crises.
|- |-
|WRITE CONTENT FOR THE "NO" BOX ABOVE THIS CODE colspan="2" width="45%" bgcolor="#F2F2F2" style="border:1px solid #BAC5FD;padding:.4em;padding-top: 0.5em ;"| |WRITE CONTENT FOR THE "NO" BOX ABOVE THIS CODE colspan="2" width="45%" bgcolor="#F2F2F2" style="border:1px solid #BAC5FD;padding:.4em;padding-top: 0.5em ;"|

Revision as of 15:13, 13 May 2008

Is the libertarian principle of smaller government and more private property a good idea?

This debate is asking whether the libertarian principle of smaller government and more private property is a good idea.

Contents

Background and Context of Debate:

Libertarians believe that control should be removed from the government and handed over to private individuals. They think that all interaction with organizations, including government, should be entirely voluntary and people should have the choice to participate in the actions they wish to take part in. People have suggested that enacting the libertarian vision would be a disaster as people who are disabled, for instance, would receive no support form the government.


Would people unable to work survive in a libertarian society?

Many people have claimed that the government is the only way of helping people who can't work. In this section this is debated.
END

Yes

  • People will receive money from charities. If, for some reason, people are unable to work and they are not able to make money they would still survive as they would receive money from charities.
  • People will receive money from families. If, for some reason, people are unable to work and they are not able to make money they would still survive as they would receive money from there families, who would clearly want them to survive.

No

  • Without receiving any government support they would have no means of survival. Sometimes people who are unable to work may receive no income other than that from the government. If the income from the government is removed, they will receive no income.
  • It is unethical to allow people to suffer. It is completely unethical to allow people to suffer because of some form of disability. Government is an important way of helping disabled people.

Should all interaction with government be voluntary?

Libertarians believe that all interaction made with anyone should be voluntary. This includes interaction with government.
END

Yes

  • People should not be forced to interact with any organization on a non voluntary basis. Even when people do not want to interact with the government, they are currently forced to do so. By making things voluntary this would remove this problem.
  • People can be trusted to make the right choices. When people are given the choice of whether they want to enroll in a system of government, they are likely to choose the one that is best for themselves and society, whether government or no government is a better choice.

No

  • Making all government interaction voluntary would cause a huge increase in crime. All criminals would choose not to interact with government, and, as a result, no one is preventing them from committing crimes.
  • People can not always be trusted to make the right choices. Without compulsory government, it would be down to individuals to make the right choices. As some people do not make the right choices, this would result in a crises.

Is the libertarian idea of smaller government a good idea?

Yes

  • People should be able to choose. By having government people are restricted in their freedom of choice as the government restricts what people are able to do. Having more private property will mean that the general public will not have to pay for property that they have never used.

No

  • People need government to prevent them from making mistakes. The laws enacted by the government are there to protect people and prevent them from making mistakes. They are needed for a fully functioning society.

Does the Libertarian party follow the principles of Libertarianism?

Yes

Click on the pencil icon and research and write arguments here

No

Click on the pencil icon and research and write arguments here

See also

External links

Problem with the site? 

Tweet a bug on bugtwits
.