Personal tools
 
Views

Debate: Libertarianism

From Debatepedia

(Difference between revisions)
Jump to: navigation, search
Revision as of 19:38, 9 April 2008 (edit)
Jonathan Winterfield (Talk | contribs)
(This is discussing libertarinaism the the libertarian party)
← Previous diff
Revision as of 05:57, 13 May 2008 (edit)
Jonathan Winterfield (Talk | contribs)
(No - add)
Next diff →
Line 35: Line 35:
|WRITE CONTENT FOR THE "YES" BOX ABOVE THIS CODE width="45%" bgcolor="#F2FAFB" style="border:1px solid #BAC5FD;padding:.4em;padding-top: 0.5em;"| |WRITE CONTENT FOR THE "YES" BOX ABOVE THIS CODE width="45%" bgcolor="#F2FAFB" style="border:1px solid #BAC5FD;padding:.4em;padding-top: 0.5em;"|
====No==== ====No====
-''Click on the pencil icon and research and write arguments here''+*'''Without receiving any government support they would have no means of survival'''. Sometimes people who are unable to work may receive no income other than that from the government. If the income from the government is removed, they will receive no income.
- +
|- |-
|WRITE CONTENT FOR THE "NO" BOX ABOVE THIS CODE colspan="2" width="45%" bgcolor="#F2F2F2" style="border:1px solid #BAC5FD;padding:.4em;padding-top: 0.5em ;"| |WRITE CONTENT FOR THE "NO" BOX ABOVE THIS CODE colspan="2" width="45%" bgcolor="#F2F2F2" style="border:1px solid #BAC5FD;padding:.4em;padding-top: 0.5em ;"|

Revision as of 05:57, 13 May 2008

Is the libertarian principle of smaller government and more private property a good idea?

This debate is asking whether the libertarian principle of smaller government and more private property is a good idea.

Contents

Background and Context of Debate:

Libertarians believe that control should be removed from the government and handed over to private individuals. They think that all interaction with organizations, including government, should be entirely voluntary and people should have the choice to participate in the actions they wish to take part in. People have suggested that enacting the libertarian vision would be a disaster as people who are disabled, for instance, would receive no support form the government.


Would people unable to work survive in a libertarian society?

Yes

  • Libertarianism relies entirely on people being able to carry out actions. If, for some reason, people are unable to work, they will not be able to make money, and, as they will not get any support from government, they will not survive.

No

  • Without receiving any government support they would have no means of survival. Sometimes people who are unable to work may receive no income other than that from the government. If the income from the government is removed, they will receive no income.

Should all interaction with government be voluntary?

Yes

Click on the pencil icon and research and write arguments here

No

Click on the pencil icon and research and write arguments here

Is the libertarian idea of smaller government a good idea?

Yes

  • People should be able to choose. By having government people are restricted in their freedom of choice as the government restricts what people are able to do. Having more private property will mean that the general public will not have to pay for property that they have never used.

No

  • People need government to prevent them from making mistakes. The laws enacted by the government are there to protect people and prevent them from making mistakes. They are needed for a fully functioning society.

See also

External links

Problem with the site? 

Tweet a bug on bugtwits
.