Personal tools
 
Views

Debate: Judicial review of direct democracy

From Debatepedia

(Difference between revisions)
Jump to: navigation, search
Revision as of 01:06, 14 December 2009 (edit)
Brooks Lindsay (Talk | contribs)

← Previous diff
Revision as of 01:10, 14 December 2009 (edit)
Brooks Lindsay (Talk | contribs)

Next diff →
Line 52: Line 52:
|WRITE CONTENT FOR THE "Con" BOX ABOVE THIS CODE colspan="2" width="45%" bgcolor="#F2F2F2" style="border:1px solid #BAC5FD;padding:.4em;padding-top: 0.5em ;"| |WRITE CONTENT FOR THE "Con" BOX ABOVE THIS CODE colspan="2" width="45%" bgcolor="#F2F2F2" style="border:1px solid #BAC5FD;padding:.4em;padding-top: 0.5em ;"|
-===Write Subquestion here...===+=== Pro/con sources ===
|- |-
Line 70: Line 70:
====Con==== ====Con====
-''Click on the pencil icon and research and write arguments here''+*[http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=959280 "The case against judicial review of direct democracy." Social Science Research Network, Indiana Law Journal. 2007]
- +
- +
- +

Revision as of 01:10, 14 December 2009

Write debate main question here...

Contents

Background and Context of Debate:

Write Subquestion here...

Pro

Click on the pencil icon and research and write arguments here





Con

Click on the pencil icon and research and write arguments here





Pro/con sources

Pro

Click on the pencil icon and research and write arguments here





Con



Write Subquestion here...

Pro

Click on the pencil icon and research and write arguments here





Con

Click on the pencil icon and research and write arguments here





References:

Related pages on Debatepedia:

External links and resources:

Problem with the site? 

Tweet a bug on bugtwits
.