Personal tools
 
Views

Debate: International space organization

From Debatepedia

(Difference between revisions)
Jump to: navigation, search
Revision as of 21:26, 6 August 2009 (edit)
Brooks Lindsay (Talk | contribs)

← Previous diff
Current revision (15:00, 8 September 2009) (edit)
Lenkahabetinova (Talk | contribs)
(categories)
 
Line 10: Line 10:
===Background and context === ===Background and context ===
- +Millions of dollars, euros, pounds, crowns etc. are spent annually on space programmes by usually ''national'' space organizations - NASA, JAXA, CSA, to name just a few. The question lies, whether it is efficient to have so many organizations that can (but do not have to) cooperate? Is it favourable? Shouldn´t we fuse all these organizations into one with coherent programme aims just like many European countries did when they formed ESA?
|} |}
{| {|
Line 18: Line 18:
|- |-
|colspan="2" width="45%" bgcolor="#F2F2F2" style="border:1px solid #BAC5FD;padding:.4em;padding-top:0.5em;"| |colspan="2" width="45%" bgcolor="#F2F2F2" style="border:1px solid #BAC5FD;padding:.4em;padding-top:0.5em;"|
- 
===Write Subquestion here...=== ===Write Subquestion here...===
Line 36: Line 35:
====Con==== ====Con====
-''Click on the pencil icon and research and write arguments here''+ 
 +*'''An international space organization would hamper competition.''' - While cooperation on the international level is generally a good idea (as is demonstrated right now with the construction of the ISS), competition has been a strong driving force behind the development of space technology (and many other human endeavours) in the past. It was the "space race" between the US and the Soviet Union that brought the pace of development of space technology to a level never seen before or since. It is China's advancement in space technology that spurred America's desire to go back to Moon (and beyond). The idea of one large, international space agency from its very principle precludes any possibility of such a competition. In short, monopoly is bad.
 + 
Line 47: Line 48:
|- |-
|WRITE CONTENT FOR THE "Con" BOX ABOVE THIS CODE colspan="2" width="45%" bgcolor="#F2F2F2" style="border:1px solid #BAC5FD;padding:.4em;padding-top: 0.5em ;"| |WRITE CONTENT FOR THE "Con" BOX ABOVE THIS CODE colspan="2" width="45%" bgcolor="#F2F2F2" style="border:1px solid #BAC5FD;padding:.4em;padding-top: 0.5em ;"|
- 
===Write Subquestion here...=== ===Write Subquestion here...===
Line 106: Line 106:
|- |-
|WRITE CONTENT FOR THE "Con" BOX ABOVE THIS CODE colspan="2" width="45%" bgcolor="#F2F2F2" style="border:1px solid #BAC5FD;padding:.4em;padding-top: 0.5em ;"| |WRITE CONTENT FOR THE "Con" BOX ABOVE THIS CODE colspan="2" width="45%" bgcolor="#F2F2F2" style="border:1px solid #BAC5FD;padding:.4em;padding-top: 0.5em ;"|
 +==See also==
 +*[[Debate: Funding for space exploration]]
 +*[[Debate: Space exploration]]
 +*[[Debate: Value of NASA]]
==External links== ==External links==
Line 111: Line 115:
[[Category:Space]] [[Category:Space]]
 +[[Category:Underdeveloped debates]]
 +[[Category:NASA]]
 +[[Category:International]]

Current revision

[Digg]
[reddit]
[Delicious]
[Facebook]

Should the world adopt an international space organization, independent of national budgets?

Background and context

Millions of dollars, euros, pounds, crowns etc. are spent annually on space programmes by usually national space organizations - NASA, JAXA, CSA, to name just a few. The question lies, whether it is efficient to have so many organizations that can (but do not have to) cooperate? Is it favourable? Shouldn´t we fuse all these organizations into one with coherent programme aims just like many European countries did when they formed ESA?

[Edit]
[Delete Subquestion section]
[Add new subquestion section]
[Move subquestion section down]

Write Subquestion here...

[Add New]

Pro

Click on the pencil icon and research and write arguments here





[Add New]

Con

  • An international space organization would hamper competition. - While cooperation on the international level is generally a good idea (as is demonstrated right now with the construction of the ISS), competition has been a strong driving force behind the development of space technology (and many other human endeavours) in the past. It was the "space race" between the US and the Soviet Union that brought the pace of development of space technology to a level never seen before or since. It is China's advancement in space technology that spurred America's desire to go back to Moon (and beyond). The idea of one large, international space agency from its very principle precludes any possibility of such a competition. In short, monopoly is bad.





[Edit]
[Delete Subquestion section]
[Add new subquestion section]
[Move subquestion section down]
[Move subquestion section up]

Write Subquestion here...

[Add New]

Pro

Click on the pencil icon and research and write arguments here





[Add New]

Con

Click on the pencil icon and research and write arguments here





[Edit]
[Delete Subquestion section]
[Add new subquestion section]
[Move subquestion section up]

Write Subquestion here...

[Add New]

Pro

Click on the pencil icon and research and write arguments here





[Add New]

Con

Click on the pencil icon and research and write arguments here





See also

External links

Problem with the site? 

Tweet a bug on bugtwits
.