Debate: Intelligent design

Is Intelligent Design a legitimate scientific theory?

Background and context

Write Subquestion here...

Yes

Click on the pencil icon and research and write arguments here

No

• Intelligent design does not restrict itself to scientific observation

• Intelligent design cannot be scientifically tested

• Intelligent design offers no scientific, predictive value

• Intelligent design closes scientific inquiry

Write Subquestion here...

Yes

Click on the pencil icon and research and write arguments here

No

Click on the pencil icon and research and write arguments here

Write Subquestion here...

Yes

• "The Science Behind Intelligent Design Theory". Intelligent Design and Evolution Awareness Center. Retrieved 1.30.08

No

• Richard Olmstead. "Intelligent Design not science". Seattle PI. August 17, 2005
• Nicole Winfield, Associated Press. "Vatican Astronomer: Intelligent Design is Not Science". Live Science. November 18, 2005
• Penny Higgins. "Why 'Intelligent Design' (ID) is not science, and why, therefore, it should not be taught in a science curriculum". Retrieved 1.30.08
• "Claim CI001: Intelligent design theory is science." The Talk Origins Archive.
• "Why 'Intelligent Design' (ID) is not science." Committee for the Scientific Investigation of Claims of the Paranormal. Retrieved 1.30.08

External links