Personal tools
 
Views

Debate: Income tax

From Debatepedia

(Difference between revisions)
Jump to: navigation, search
Revision as of 02:28, 5 December 2008 (edit)
Wisdomteeth (Talk | contribs)
(Write Subquestion here...)
← Previous diff
Current revision (09:14, 4 August 2009) (edit)
Lenkahabetinova (Talk | contribs)
(internal links)
 
Line 21: Line 21:
|- |-
|colspan="2" width="45%" bgcolor="#F2F2F2" style="border:1px solid #BAC5FD;padding:.4em;padding-top:0.5em;"| |colspan="2" width="45%" bgcolor="#F2F2F2" style="border:1px solid #BAC5FD;padding:.4em;padding-top:0.5em;"|
- +===Is payment of income tax required by US law?===
-===Is there a legal requirement for the income tax to be paid in the US?===+
|- |-
|WRITE SUBQUESTION BETWEEN "=== ===" width="45%" bgcolor="#FFFAE0" style="border:1px solid #BAC5FD;padding:.4em;padding-top:0.5em;"| |WRITE SUBQUESTION BETWEEN "=== ===" width="45%" bgcolor="#FFFAE0" style="border:1px solid #BAC5FD;padding:.4em;padding-top:0.5em;"|
====Yes==== ====Yes====
-''Click on the pencil icon and research and write arguments here'' 
- 
- 
 +*[http://law2.house.gov/uscode-cgi/fastweb.exe?getdoc+uscview+t26t28+7+6++()%20%20AND%20((26)%20ADJ%20USC)%3ACITE%20AND%20(USC%20w%2F10%20(1))%3ACITE Section 1 of the Internal Revenue Code] - "There is hereby imposed on the taxable income of (1) every married individual … and (2) every surviving spouse … a tax …"; "There is hereby imposed on the taxable income of every head of a household … a tax …"; and "There is hereby imposed on the taxable income of every individual … who is not a married individual … a tax…"
 +:26 CFR 1.1-1(a) General rule. (1) Section 1 of the Code imposes an income tax on the income of every individual who is a citizen or resident of the United States and, to the extent provided by section 871(b) or 877(b), on the income of a nonresident alien individual.[http://www.supremelaw.org/cfr/26/26cfr1.1-1.htm]
Line 37: Line 35:
|WRITE CONTENT FOR THE "YES" BOX ABOVE THIS CODE width="45%" bgcolor="#F2FAFB" style="border:1px solid #BAC5FD;padding:.4em;padding-top: 0.5em;"| |WRITE CONTENT FOR THE "YES" BOX ABOVE THIS CODE width="45%" bgcolor="#F2FAFB" style="border:1px solid #BAC5FD;padding:.4em;padding-top: 0.5em;"|
- 
====No==== ====No====
-''Click on the pencil icon and research and write arguments here'' 
- 
- 
- 
 +*'''Income is not defined clearly in US tax code or Constitution.''' Needs The word "income" is not defined even once in the IRS tax code, and if we refer to the definition of "income" as defined by the Constitution, we find that it is actually defined as "profit" or "gains," not compensation for labor, which as the_divine_mrs_m pointed out, is actually more of a barter than a profit.
 +:[Staples v. U.S., 21 F Supp 737 U.S. Dist. Ct. ED PA, 1937] - "Income within the meaning of the 16th Amendment and the Revenue Act means, gain ... and, in such connection, gain means profit... proceeding from property severed from capital, however invested or employed and coming in, received or drawn by the taxpayer for his separate use, benefit and disposal."
Line 56: Line 51:
====Yes==== ====Yes====
-''Click on the pencil icon and research and write arguments here''+*Article 1 Section 8 of the U.S. Constitution states, in part, "The Congress shall have Power To lay and collect Taxes, Duties, Imposts and Excises,..."
Line 66: Line 61:
|WRITE CONTENT FOR THE "YES" BOX ABOVE THIS CODE width="45%" bgcolor="#F2FAFB" style="border:1px solid #BAC5FD;padding:.4em;padding-top: 0.5em;"| |WRITE CONTENT FOR THE "YES" BOX ABOVE THIS CODE width="45%" bgcolor="#F2FAFB" style="border:1px solid #BAC5FD;padding:.4em;padding-top: 0.5em;"|
- 
====No==== ====No====
''Click on the pencil icon and research and write arguments here'' ''Click on the pencil icon and research and write arguments here''
Line 108: Line 102:
|- |-
|WRITE CONTENT FOR THE "NO" BOX ABOVE THIS CODE colspan="2" width="45%" bgcolor="#F2F2F2" style="border:1px solid #BAC5FD;padding:.4em;padding-top: 0.5em ;"| |WRITE CONTENT FOR THE "NO" BOX ABOVE THIS CODE colspan="2" width="45%" bgcolor="#F2F2F2" style="border:1px solid #BAC5FD;padding:.4em;padding-top: 0.5em ;"|
-===References:=== +===Pro/con sources===
 + 
|- |-
-|colspan="2" width="45%" bgcolor="#F2F2F2" style="border:1px solid #BAC5FD;"|+|width="45%" bgcolor="#FFFAE0" style="border:1px solid #BAC5FD;padding:.4em;padding-top:0.5em;"|
-===Related pages on Debatepedia:===+====Yes====
-|-+
-|colspan="2" width="45%" bgcolor="#F2F2F2" style="border:1px solid #BAC5FD;"| +
-===External links and resources:===+|width="45%" bgcolor="#F2FAFB" style="border:1px solid #BAC5FD;padding:.4em;padding-top:0.5em;"|
 + 
 +====No====
 + 
 +*[http://www.house.gov/paul/tst/tst2001/tst050701.htm Ron Paul. "The Case Against the Income Tax". Texas Straight Talk. 7 May 2001]
 +*[http://www.washingtonpolicy.org/Centers/government/policynotes/03_tuerck_economiccase.html Carl Gipson, Director, Center for Small Business. "The Economic Case Against an Income Tax in Washington State". Washington Policy Center. Nov. 2007]
 + 
 + 
 + 
 +|-
 +|colspan="2" width="45%" bgcolor="#F2F2F2" style="border:1px solid #BAC5FD;padding:.4em;padding-top:0.5em;"|
 +==See also==
 +*[[Debate: Abolishing direct taxation]]
 +*[[Debate: Abolishing the income tax]]
 +==External links==

Current revision

[Digg]
[reddit]
[Delicious]
[Facebook]

Is the income tax a good idea, or should it be abolished?

Contents

Background and Context of Debate:

[Edit]
[Delete Subquestion section]
[Add new subquestion section]
[Move subquestion section down]

Is payment of income tax required by US law?

[Add New]

Yes

  • Section 1 of the Internal Revenue Code - "There is hereby imposed on the taxable income of (1) every married individual … and (2) every surviving spouse … a tax …"; "There is hereby imposed on the taxable income of every head of a household … a tax …"; and "There is hereby imposed on the taxable income of every individual … who is not a married individual … a tax…"
26 CFR 1.1-1(a) General rule. (1) Section 1 of the Code imposes an income tax on the income of every individual who is a citizen or resident of the United States and, to the extent provided by section 871(b) or 877(b), on the income of a nonresident alien individual.[1]



[Add New]

No

  • Income is not defined clearly in US tax code or Constitution. Needs The word "income" is not defined even once in the IRS tax code, and if we refer to the definition of "income" as defined by the Constitution, we find that it is actually defined as "profit" or "gains," not compensation for labor, which as the_divine_mrs_m pointed out, is actually more of a barter than a profit.
[Staples v. U.S., 21 F Supp 737 U.S. Dist. Ct. ED PA, 1937] - "Income within the meaning of the 16th Amendment and the Revenue Act means, gain ... and, in such connection, gain means profit... proceeding from property severed from capital, however invested or employed and coming in, received or drawn by the taxpayer for his separate use, benefit and disposal."


[Edit]
[Delete Subquestion section]
[Add new subquestion section]
[Move subquestion section down]
[Move subquestion section up]

Would an income tax be constitutional in the US?

[Add New]

Yes

  • Article 1 Section 8 of the U.S. Constitution states, in part, "The Congress shall have Power To lay and collect Taxes, Duties, Imposts and Excises,..."





[Add New]

No

Click on the pencil icon and research and write arguments here





[Edit]
[Delete Subquestion section]
[Add new subquestion section]
[Move subquestion section down]
[Move subquestion section up]

Are income taxes effective at promoting social justice?

[Add New]

Yes

Click on the pencil icon and research and write arguments here





[Add New]

No

Click on the pencil icon and research and write arguments here





[Edit]
[Delete Subquestion section]
[Add new subquestion section]
[Move subquestion section up]

Pro/con sources

[Add New]

Yes

[Add New]

No


See also

External links

Problem with the site? 

Tweet a bug on bugtwits
.