Personal tools
 
Views

Debate: Fusion power

From Debatepedia

(Difference between revisions)
Jump to: navigation, search
Revision as of 17:21, 9 October 2009 (edit)
Brooks Lindsay (Talk | contribs)
(Efficiency: Is fusion an efficient way to generate electricity?)
← Previous diff
Revision as of 10:19, 10 October 2009 (edit)
Renergy (Talk | contribs)
(Con)
Next diff →
Line 39: Line 39:
====Con==== ====Con====
-''Click on the pencil icon and research and write arguments here''+*'''The transformation of kinetic energy of neturons to electricity is a complicated process''' - Most of the energy obtained by fusion of atomic nuclei is in the form of kinetic energy of neutrons. It's a long way from there to electricity.

Revision as of 10:19, 10 October 2009

Does fusion power represent the future of energy generation?

Contents

Background and Context of Debate:

Efficiency: Is fusion an efficient way to generate electricity?

Pro

Click on the pencil icon and research and write arguments here





Con

  • The transformation of kinetic energy of neturons to electricity is a complicated process - Most of the energy obtained by fusion of atomic nuclei is in the form of kinetic energy of neutrons. It's a long way from there to electricity.





Write Subquestion here...

Pro

Click on the pencil icon and research and write arguments here





Con

Click on the pencil icon and research and write arguments here





Will fusion power become a reality within the next 30 years?

Pro

Click on the pencil icon and research and write arguments here





Con

Click on the pencil icon and research and write arguments here





See also

External links and resources

Problem with the site? 

Tweet a bug on bugtwits
.