Debate Digest: Teacher-student friendships on Facebook, Law school, Balanced budget amendment, US debt ceiling deal.
Debate: Fairness Doctrine
From Debatepedia
(Difference between revisions)
Revision as of 21:22, 12 November 2008 (edit) Brooks Lindsay (Talk | contribs) (→No) ← Previous diff |
Revision as of 21:29, 12 November 2008 (edit) Brooks Lindsay (Talk | contribs) (→No) Next diff → |
||
Line 36: | Line 36: | ||
====No==== | ====No==== | ||
- | *'''Widespread modern media makes Fairness Doctrine unnecessary.''' [http://www.heritage.org/research/regulation/em368.cfm Adam Thierer. "Why the Fairness Doctrine is Anything But Fair". Heritage Foundation. 29 Oct. 1993] - "The doctrine's supporters seem not to appreciate just how much the broadcast world has changed since 1949. With the proliferation of informational resources and technology, the number of broadcast outlets available to the public has increased steadily. In such an environment, it is hard to understand why the federal government must police the airwaves to ensure that differing views are heard." | + | *'''[[Argument: Fairness Doctrine ignores sufficiency of modern media outlets| Fairness Doctrine ignores sufficiency of modern media outlets]]''' [http://www.heritage.org/research/regulation/em368.cfm Adam Thierer. "Why the Fairness Doctrine is Anything But Fair". Heritage Foundation. 29 Oct. 1993] - "The doctrine's supporters seem not to appreciate just how much the broadcast world has changed since 1949. With the proliferation of informational resources and technology, the number of broadcast outlets available to the public has increased steadily. In such an environment, it is hard to understand why the federal government must police the airwaves to ensure that differing views are heard." |
*'''[[Argument: Fairness Doctrine harms instead of protecting free speech| Fairness Doctrine harms instead of protecting free speech]]''' [http://www.heritage.org/research/regulation/em368.cfm Adam Thierer. "Why the Fairness Doctrine is Anything But Fair". Heritage Foundation. 29 Oct. 1993] - "The result of a reinstituted fairness doctrine would not be fair at all. In practice, much controversial speech heard today would be stifled as the threat of random investigations and warnings discouraged broadcasters from airing what FCC bureaucrats might refer to as 'unbalanced' views." | *'''[[Argument: Fairness Doctrine harms instead of protecting free speech| Fairness Doctrine harms instead of protecting free speech]]''' [http://www.heritage.org/research/regulation/em368.cfm Adam Thierer. "Why the Fairness Doctrine is Anything But Fair". Heritage Foundation. 29 Oct. 1993] - "The result of a reinstituted fairness doctrine would not be fair at all. In practice, much controversial speech heard today would be stifled as the threat of random investigations and warnings discouraged broadcasters from airing what FCC bureaucrats might refer to as 'unbalanced' views." |
Revision as of 21:29, 12 November 2008
Should the Fairness Doctrine be Reinstated? |
|
Does the Fairness Doctrine breach the First Amendment? | |
YesClick on the pencil icon and research and write arguments here |
No
|
Write Subquestion here... | |
YesClick on the pencil icon and research and write arguments here |
NoClick on the pencil icon and research and write arguments here |
Write Subquestion here... | |
Yes
|
No
|
References: | |
Related pages on Debatepedia: | |
External links and resources: |