Personal tools
 
Views

Debate: E-books vs traditional books

From Debatepedia

Revision as of 02:00, 29 July 2010; FilmBuff84 (Talk | contribs)
(diff) ←Older revision | Current revision | Newer revision→ (diff)
Jump to: navigation, search

E-books are superior to traditional books.

Contents

Background and Context of Debate:

Write Subquestion here...

Pro

E-book readers can quickly update content for accuracy and relevance.





Con

Traditional, paper books are immune to viruses, dead batteries, and other technical malfunctions.





Write Subquestion here...

Pro

Because they are paperless, e-books have less impact on the environment.





Con

A hardcover book has greater monetary value than an easily copied e-book.





Write Subquestion here...

Pro

E-books are more convenient as an entire library can be stored in a single reader.





Con

E-books threaten the publishing industry.





References:

Related pages on Debatepedia:

External links and resources:

Problem with the site? 

Tweet a bug on bugtwits
.