Personal tools
 
Views

Debate: E-books vs traditional books

From Debatepedia

(Difference between revisions)
Jump to: navigation, search
Revision as of 01:58, 29 July 2010 (edit)
FilmBuff84 (Talk | contribs)
(Con)
← Previous diff
Revision as of 01:59, 29 July 2010 (edit)
FilmBuff84 (Talk | contribs)
(Con)
Next diff →
Line 66: Line 66:
|WRITE CONTENT FOR THE "Pro" BOX ABOVE THIS CODE width="45%" bgcolor="#F2FAFB" style="border:1px solid #BAC5FD;padding:.4em;padding-top: 0.5em;"| |WRITE CONTENT FOR THE "Pro" BOX ABOVE THIS CODE width="45%" bgcolor="#F2FAFB" style="border:1px solid #BAC5FD;padding:.4em;padding-top: 0.5em;"|
====Con==== ====Con====
-''Click "edit" and write arguments here''+''A hardcover book has greater monetary value than an easily copied e-book.''

Revision as of 01:59, 29 July 2010

E-books are superior to traditional books.

Contents

Background and Context of Debate:

Write Subquestion here...

Pro

E-book readers can quickly update content for accuracy and relevance.





Con

Traditional, paper books are immune to viruses, dead batteries, and other technical malfunctions.





Write Subquestion here...

Pro

Because they are paperless, e-books have less impact on the environment.





Con

A hardcover book has greater monetary value than an easily copied e-book.





Write Subquestion here...

Pro

E-books are more convenient as an entire library can be stored in a single reader.





Con

Click "edit" and write arguments here





References:

Related pages on Debatepedia:

External links and resources:

Problem with the site? 

Tweet a bug on bugtwits
.