Personal tools
 
Views

Debate: E-books vs traditional books

From Debatepedia

(Difference between revisions)
Jump to: navigation, search
Revision as of 01:57, 29 July 2010 (edit)
FilmBuff84 (Talk | contribs)
(Pro)
← Previous diff
Revision as of 01:58, 29 July 2010 (edit)
FilmBuff84 (Talk | contribs)
(Con)
Next diff →
Line 38: Line 38:
|WRITE CONTENT FOR THE "Pro" BOX ABOVE THIS CODE width="45%" bgcolor="#F2FAFB" style="border:1px solid #BAC5FD;padding:.4em;padding-top: 0.5em;"| |WRITE CONTENT FOR THE "Pro" BOX ABOVE THIS CODE width="45%" bgcolor="#F2FAFB" style="border:1px solid #BAC5FD;padding:.4em;padding-top: 0.5em;"|
====Con==== ====Con====
-''Click "edit" and write arguments here''+''Traditional, paper books are immune to viruses, dead batteries, and other technical malfunctions.''
Line 49: Line 49:
|- |-
|WRITE CONTENT FOR THE "Con" BOX ABOVE THIS CODE colspan="2" width="45%" bgcolor="#F2F2F2" style="border:1px solid #BAC5FD;padding:.4em;padding-top: 0.5em ;"| |WRITE CONTENT FOR THE "Con" BOX ABOVE THIS CODE colspan="2" width="45%" bgcolor="#F2F2F2" style="border:1px solid #BAC5FD;padding:.4em;padding-top: 0.5em ;"|
- 
===Write Subquestion here...=== ===Write Subquestion here...===

Revision as of 01:58, 29 July 2010

E-books are superior to traditional books.

Contents

Background and Context of Debate:

Write Subquestion here...

Pro

E-book readers can quickly update content for accuracy and relevance.





Con

Traditional, paper books are immune to viruses, dead batteries, and other technical malfunctions.





Write Subquestion here...

Pro

Because they are paperless, e-books have less impact on the environment.





Con

Click "edit" and write arguments here





Write Subquestion here...

Pro

E-books are more convenient as an entire library can be stored in a single reader.





Con

Click "edit" and write arguments here





References:

Related pages on Debatepedia:

External links and resources:

Problem with the site? 

Tweet a bug on bugtwits
.