Personal tools
 
Views

Debate: E-books vs traditional books

From Debatepedia

(Difference between revisions)
Jump to: navigation, search
Revision as of 01:55, 29 July 2010 (edit)
FilmBuff84 (Talk | contribs)
(Pro)
← Previous diff
Revision as of 01:57, 29 July 2010 (edit)
FilmBuff84 (Talk | contribs)
(Pro)
Next diff →
Line 84: Line 84:
====Pro==== ====Pro====
-''Click "edit" and write arguments here''+''E-books are more convenient as an entire library can be stored in a single reader.''
Line 94: Line 94:
|WRITE CONTENT FOR THE "Pro" BOX ABOVE THIS CODE width="45%" bgcolor="#F2FAFB" style="border:1px solid #BAC5FD;padding:.4em;padding-top: 0.5em;"| |WRITE CONTENT FOR THE "Pro" BOX ABOVE THIS CODE width="45%" bgcolor="#F2FAFB" style="border:1px solid #BAC5FD;padding:.4em;padding-top: 0.5em;"|
- 
====Con==== ====Con====
''Click "edit" and write arguments here'' ''Click "edit" and write arguments here''

Revision as of 01:57, 29 July 2010

E-books are superior to traditional books.

Contents

Background and Context of Debate:

Write Subquestion here...

Pro

E-book readers can quickly update content for accuracy and relevance.





Con

Click "edit" and write arguments here





Write Subquestion here...

Pro

Because they are paperless, e-books have less impact on the environment.





Con

Click "edit" and write arguments here





Write Subquestion here...

Pro

E-books are more convenient as an entire library can be stored in a single reader.





Con

Click "edit" and write arguments here





References:

Related pages on Debatepedia:

External links and resources:

Problem with the site? 

Tweet a bug on bugtwits
.