Personal tools
 
Views

Debate: E-books vs traditional books

From Debatepedia

(Difference between revisions)
Jump to: navigation, search
Revision as of 01:54, 29 July 2010 (edit)
FilmBuff84 (Talk | contribs)
(Pro)
← Previous diff
Revision as of 01:55, 29 July 2010 (edit)
FilmBuff84 (Talk | contribs)
(Pro)
Next diff →
Line 56: Line 56:
====Pro==== ====Pro====
-''Click "edit" and write arguments here''+''Because they are paperless, e-books have less impact on the environment.''
Line 66: Line 66:
|WRITE CONTENT FOR THE "Pro" BOX ABOVE THIS CODE width="45%" bgcolor="#F2FAFB" style="border:1px solid #BAC5FD;padding:.4em;padding-top: 0.5em;"| |WRITE CONTENT FOR THE "Pro" BOX ABOVE THIS CODE width="45%" bgcolor="#F2FAFB" style="border:1px solid #BAC5FD;padding:.4em;padding-top: 0.5em;"|
- 
====Con==== ====Con====
''Click "edit" and write arguments here'' ''Click "edit" and write arguments here''

Revision as of 01:55, 29 July 2010

E-books are superior to traditional books.

Contents

Background and Context of Debate:

Write Subquestion here...

Pro

E-book readers can quickly update content for accuracy and relevance.





Con

Click "edit" and write arguments here





Write Subquestion here...

Pro

Because they are paperless, e-books have less impact on the environment.





Con

Click "edit" and write arguments here





Write Subquestion here...

Pro

Click "edit" and write arguments here





Con

Click "edit" and write arguments here





References:

Related pages on Debatepedia:

External links and resources:

Problem with the site? 

Tweet a bug on bugtwits
.