Welcome to Debatepedia! | About | Help | FAQ | Media Kit

Personal tools

Views

Search

getting started

Other resources

Toolbox

Debate Digest: Teacher-student friendships on Facebook, Law school, Balanced budget amendment, US debt ceiling deal.

Debate: Did William the Conqueror deserve to be King of England

From Debatepedia

Revision as of 23:54, 21 July 2011; Brooks Lindsay (Talk | contribs)
(diff) ←Older revision | Current revision | Newer revision→ (diff)

Jump to: navigation, search

[

Digg

]

[

reddit

]

[

Delicious

]

[

]

Background and context

[Edit] [] [] [] Was William a legitimate King?
[] [Edit] Pro Click "edit" and write arguments here	[] [Edit] Con It is fairly well known that William the Conqueror was an illegitimate child, such as have never been allowed to rule England since well before his day to the present. We do not necessarily condone such discrimination as no one can choose their parents, but this rule of inheritance, despite having stood in other cases, seems to have been ignored in his case.
[Edit] [] [] [] [] [] How much evidence is there to support his claims that he had been promised the throne?
[] [Edit] Pro Click "edit" and write arguments here	[] [Edit] Con Click "edit" and write arguments here
[Edit] [] [] [] [] [] Was he more ethical than his rivals?
[] [Edit] Pro	[] [Edit] Con
[Edit] [] [] [] [] How skilled a ruler was he compared to his rivals?
[] [Edit] Pro Click "edit" and write arguments here	[] [Edit] Con Click "edit" and write arguments here
[Edit] References:
[Edit] Related pages on Debatepedia:
[Edit] External links and resources: ,,

Retrieved from "http://dbp.idebate.org/en/index.php/Debate:_Did_William_the_Conqueror_deserve_to_be_King_of_England"

Categories: Underdeveloped debates | History | Morality

Problem with the site?

.