Debate Digest: Teacher-student friendships on Facebook, Law school, Balanced budget amendment, US debt ceiling deal.
Debate: Crime investigation
From Debatepedia
(Difference between revisions)
Revision as of 15:34, 27 July 2009 (edit) Lenkahabetinova (Talk | contribs) (justice) ← Previous diff |
Current revision (10:48, 19 January 2010) (edit) Webeditor (Talk | contribs) (→External links and resources) |
||
Line 13: | Line 13: | ||
|bgcolor="#F7F7F7" colspan="2" style= "border:1px solid #BAC5FD"| | |bgcolor="#F7F7F7" colspan="2" style= "border:1px solid #BAC5FD"| | ||
===Background and Context of Debate:=== | ===Background and Context of Debate:=== | ||
- | Serious crimes get more attention are investigated with greater vigour than minor crimes. Is that right, is that fair (given that 60% of all the victims are victims of minor crimes)? | + | Serious crimes get more attention are investigated with greater vigour than minor crimes (''=small financial crimes, pickpocketing, crimes without the consequence of serious injury''). Is that right, is that fair (given that 60% of all the victims are victims of minor crimes)? |
|} | |} | ||
{| | {| | ||
Line 26: | Line 26: | ||
|WRITE SUBQUESTION BETWEEN "=== ===" width="45%" bgcolor="#FFFAE0" style="border:1px solid #BAC5FD;padding:.4em;padding-top:0.5em;"| | |WRITE SUBQUESTION BETWEEN "=== ===" width="45%" bgcolor="#FFFAE0" style="border:1px solid #BAC5FD;padding:.4em;padding-top:0.5em;"| | ||
====Pro==== | ====Pro==== | ||
- | ''Click on the pencil icon and research and write arguments here'' | + | *'''Organised crime.''' Drug dealers are a vital link between drug demand and offer. By imprisoning drug dealers we are ''effectively undermining'' these organised groups from the bottom. |
+ | *'''First step.''' Minor crimes can be seen as a first step towards serious crimes. One might start as a pickpocketer and end ur robbing a bank, shooting someone on the run. Pursuing minor crimes is a necessary prevention and deterrence for ''future'' criminals. | ||
+ | *'''Removing the easy opportunity to commit crime.''' By investigating and impisoning criminals we are sending the message that ''crime really does not pay''. | ||
Line 35: | Line 37: | ||
- | |WRITE CONTENT FOR THE "Pro" BOX ABOVE THIS CODE width="45%" bgcolor="#F2FAFB" style="border:1px solid #BAC5FD;padding:.4em;padding-top: 0.5em;"| | ||
+ | |||
+ | |WRITE CONTENT FOR THE "Pro" BOX ABOVE THIS CODE width="45%" bgcolor="#F2FAFB" style="border:1px solid #BAC5FD;padding:.4em;padding-top: 0.5em;"| | ||
====Con==== | ====Con==== | ||
''Click on the pencil icon and research and write arguments here'' | ''Click on the pencil icon and research and write arguments here'' | ||
Line 109: | Line 112: | ||
==See also== | ==See also== | ||
- | ===External links and resources:=== | + | ==External links and resources== |
+ | * [http://www.crimestoppers-uk.org Crimestoppers - Charity to pass on information about crime anonymously] | ||
|} | |} | ||
+ | [[Category:Underdeveloped debates]] | ||
+ | [[Category:Crime]] | ||
+ | [[Category:Justice]] |
Current revision
[Edit] This House believes that minor crimes should be pursued with the same vigour as serious crimes |
|
[Edit] Background and Context of Debate:Serious crimes get more attention are investigated with greater vigour than minor crimes (=small financial crimes, pickpocketing, crimes without the consequence of serious injury). Is that right, is that fair (given that 60% of all the victims are victims of minor crimes)? |
[Edit] [ ![]() Efficiency: | |
[Edit] Pro
|
[Edit] ConClick on the pencil icon and research and write arguments here
|
[Edit] [ ![]() Justice: | |
[Edit] Pro
|
[Edit] ConClick on the pencil icon and research and write arguments here
|
[Edit] [ ![]() Write Subquestion here... | |
[Edit] ProClick on the pencil icon and research and write arguments here
|
[Edit] ConClick on the pencil icon and research and write arguments here
|
[Edit] See also[Edit] External links and resources |