Debate Digest: Teacher-student friendships on Facebook, Law school, Balanced budget amendment, US debt ceiling deal.
Debate: Crime investigation
From Debatepedia
(Difference between revisions)
Revision as of 15:37, 27 July 2009 (edit) Lenkahabetinova (Talk | contribs) (editing sections) ← Previous diff |
Revision as of 15:43, 27 July 2009 (edit) Lenkahabetinova (Talk | contribs) (→Pro) Next diff → |
||
Line 26: | Line 26: | ||
|WRITE SUBQUESTION BETWEEN "=== ===" width="45%" bgcolor="#FFFAE0" style="border:1px solid #BAC5FD;padding:.4em;padding-top:0.5em;"| | |WRITE SUBQUESTION BETWEEN "=== ===" width="45%" bgcolor="#FFFAE0" style="border:1px solid #BAC5FD;padding:.4em;padding-top:0.5em;"| | ||
====Pro==== | ====Pro==== | ||
- | ''Click on the pencil icon and research and write arguments here'' | + | *'''Organised crime.''' Drug dealers are a vital link between drug demand and offer. By imprisoning drug dealers we are ''effectively undermining'' these organised groups from the bottom. |
+ | *'''First step.''' Minor crimes can be seen as a first step towards serious crimes. One might start as a pickpocketer and end ur robbing a bank, shooting someone on the run. Pursuing minor crimes is a necessary prevention and deterrence for ''future'' criminals. | ||
+ | *'''Removing the easy opportunity to commit crime.''' By investigating and impisoning criminals we are sending the message that ''crime really does not pay''. | ||
Line 35: | Line 37: | ||
- | |WRITE CONTENT FOR THE "Pro" BOX ABOVE THIS CODE width="45%" bgcolor="#F2FAFB" style="border:1px solid #BAC5FD;padding:.4em;padding-top: 0.5em;"| | ||
+ | |||
+ | |WRITE CONTENT FOR THE "Pro" BOX ABOVE THIS CODE width="45%" bgcolor="#F2FAFB" style="border:1px solid #BAC5FD;padding:.4em;padding-top: 0.5em;"| | ||
====Con==== | ====Con==== | ||
''Click on the pencil icon and research and write arguments here'' | ''Click on the pencil icon and research and write arguments here'' |
Revision as of 15:43, 27 July 2009
This House believes that minor crimes should be pursued with the same vigour as serious crimes |
|