Debate Digest: Teacher-student friendships on Facebook, Law school, Balanced budget amendment, US debt ceiling deal.
Debate: Crime investigation
From Debatepedia
(Difference between revisions)
| Revision as of 15:34, 27 July 2009 (edit) Lenkahabetinova (Talk | contribs) (justice) ← Previous diff |
Revision as of 15:36, 27 July 2009 (edit) Lenkahabetinova (Talk | contribs) (→Background and Context of Debate:) Next diff → |
||
| Line 13: | Line 13: | ||
| |bgcolor="#F7F7F7" colspan="2" style= "border:1px solid #BAC5FD"| | |bgcolor="#F7F7F7" colspan="2" style= "border:1px solid #BAC5FD"| | ||
| ===Background and Context of Debate:=== | ===Background and Context of Debate:=== | ||
| - | Serious crimes get more attention are investigated with greater vigour than minor crimes. Is that right, is that fair (given that 60% of all the victims are victims of minor crimes)? | + | Serious crimes get more attention are investigated with greater vigour than minor crimes (''=small financial crimes, pickpocketing, crimes without the consequence of serious injury''). Is that right, is that fair (given that 60% of all the victims are victims of minor crimes)? |
| |} | |} | ||
| {| | {| | ||
Revision as of 15:36, 27 July 2009
This House believes that minor crimes should be pursued with the same vigour as serious crimes |
|
