Debate Digest: Teacher-student friendships on Facebook, Law school, Balanced budget amendment, US debt ceiling deal.
Debate: Crime investigation
From Debatepedia
(Difference between revisions)
Revision as of 15:31, 27 July 2009 (edit) Lenkahabetinova (Talk | contribs) (see also section) ← Previous diff |
Revision as of 15:34, 27 July 2009 (edit) Lenkahabetinova (Talk | contribs) (justice) Next diff → |
||
Line 49: | Line 49: | ||
|- | |- | ||
|WRITE CONTENT FOR THE "Con" BOX ABOVE THIS CODE colspan="2" width="45%" bgcolor="#F2F2F2" style="border:1px solid #BAC5FD;padding:.4em;padding-top: 0.5em ;"| | |WRITE CONTENT FOR THE "Con" BOX ABOVE THIS CODE colspan="2" width="45%" bgcolor="#F2F2F2" style="border:1px solid #BAC5FD;padding:.4em;padding-top: 0.5em ;"| | ||
- | ===Write Subquestion here...=== | + | ===Justice:=== |
|- | |- | ||
Line 55: | Line 55: | ||
====Pro==== | ====Pro==== | ||
- | ''Click on the pencil icon and research and write arguments here'' | + | *'''Minor crimes affect a wider part of society.''' Minor crimes trouble our society as they are more common, affect more people, have more victims. If we want our legal system to make sense, we should try to punish as many criminals as possible, thus investigate minor crimes with same same vigour as serious crimes. |
Revision as of 15:34, 27 July 2009
This House believes that minor crimes should be pursued with the same vigour as serious crimes |
|