Personal tools
 
Views

Debate: Crime investigation

From Debatepedia

(Difference between revisions)
Jump to: navigation, search
Revision as of 15:28, 27 July 2009 (edit)
Lenkahabetinova (Talk | contribs)
(Subquestion)
← Previous diff
Revision as of 15:30, 27 July 2009 (edit)
Lenkahabetinova (Talk | contribs)
(delete)
Next diff →
Line 107: Line 107:
|- |-
|WRITE CONTENT FOR THE "Con" BOX ABOVE THIS CODE colspan="2" width="45%" bgcolor="#F2F2F2" style="border:1px solid #BAC5FD;padding:.4em;padding-top: 0.5em ;"| |WRITE CONTENT FOR THE "Con" BOX ABOVE THIS CODE colspan="2" width="45%" bgcolor="#F2F2F2" style="border:1px solid #BAC5FD;padding:.4em;padding-top: 0.5em ;"|
-===References:=== + 
-|-+
-|colspan="2" width="45%" bgcolor="#F2F2F2" style="border:1px solid #BAC5FD;"|+
===Related pages on Debatepedia:=== ===Related pages on Debatepedia:===
|- |-

Revision as of 15:30, 27 July 2009

This House believes that minor crimes should be pursued with the same vigour as serious crimes

Contents

Background and Context of Debate:

Serious crimes get more attention are investigated with greater vigour than minor crimes. Is that right, is that fair (given that 60% of all the victims are victims of minor crimes)?

Efficiency:

Pro

Click on the pencil icon and research and write arguments here





Con

Click on the pencil icon and research and write arguments here





Write Subquestion here...

Pro

Click on the pencil icon and research and write arguments here





Con

Click on the pencil icon and research and write arguments here





Write Subquestion here...

Pro

Click on the pencil icon and research and write arguments here





Con

Click on the pencil icon and research and write arguments here





Related pages on Debatepedia:

External links and resources:

Problem with the site? 

Tweet a bug on bugtwits
.