Personal tools
 
Views

Debate: Ban on advertising

From Debatepedia

(Difference between revisions)
Jump to: navigation, search
Revision as of 12:48, 6 March 2010 (edit)
Lenkahabetinova (Talk | contribs)
(categories, book, internal link)
← Previous diff
Revision as of 13:00, 6 March 2010 (edit)
Lenkahabetinova (Talk | contribs)
(morality)
Next diff →
Line 23: Line 23:
|colspan="2" width="45%" bgcolor="#F2F2F2" style="border:1px solid #BAC5FD;padding:.4em;padding-top:0.5em;"| |colspan="2" width="45%" bgcolor="#F2F2F2" style="border:1px solid #BAC5FD;padding:.4em;padding-top:0.5em;"|
-===Write Subquestion here...===+===Morality: Is advertising in principle immoral?===
|- |-
|WRITE SUBQUESTION BETWEEN "=== ===" width="45%" bgcolor="#FFFAE0" style="border:1px solid #BAC5FD;padding:.4em;padding-top:0.5em;"| |WRITE SUBQUESTION BETWEEN "=== ===" width="45%" bgcolor="#FFFAE0" style="border:1px solid #BAC5FD;padding:.4em;padding-top:0.5em;"|
====Pro==== ====Pro====
-''Click "edit" and write arguments here''+*'''Advertising promotes non-rationality.''' There is nothing moral about encouraging customers to be non-rational and impulsive in spending.
 +*'''"Advertising manipulates small children''' even before they reach the age when they are legally responsible for their actions." [Vance Packard, "The Hidden Persuaders"]
 +*'''Advertising exploits our deepest fears, sensitivities and yearning.''' There is nothing moral about such actions, the less for commercial purposes.
 +
 +*'''Advertising creates an attitude of wastefulness.''' There is no justification for encouraging the "psychological obsolescence" of products currently in use.
Line 40: Line 44:
====Con==== ====Con====
-''Click "edit" and write arguments here''+*'''Advertising leaves everybody better off.''' Not only do the consumers benefit from the products they buy thanks to adverts, but also the whole economy benefits from these "impulsive" buys, thus leaving everybody better off (both the producers and consumers).
Line 51: Line 55:
|- |-
|WRITE CONTENT FOR THE "Con" BOX ABOVE THIS CODE colspan="2" width="45%" bgcolor="#F2F2F2" style="border:1px solid #BAC5FD;padding:.4em;padding-top: 0.5em ;"| |WRITE CONTENT FOR THE "Con" BOX ABOVE THIS CODE colspan="2" width="45%" bgcolor="#F2F2F2" style="border:1px solid #BAC5FD;padding:.4em;padding-top: 0.5em ;"|
- 
===Write Subquestion here...=== ===Write Subquestion here...===

Revision as of 13:00, 6 March 2010

Should advertising be banned?

Contents

Background and Context of Debate:

Morality: Is advertising in principle immoral?

Pro

  • Advertising promotes non-rationality. There is nothing moral about encouraging customers to be non-rational and impulsive in spending.
  • "Advertising manipulates small children even before they reach the age when they are legally responsible for their actions." [Vance Packard, "The Hidden Persuaders"]
  • Advertising exploits our deepest fears, sensitivities and yearning. There is nothing moral about such actions, the less for commercial purposes.
  • Advertising creates an attitude of wastefulness. There is no justification for encouraging the "psychological obsolescence" of products currently in use.




Con

  • Advertising leaves everybody better off. Not only do the consumers benefit from the products they buy thanks to adverts, but also the whole economy benefits from these "impulsive" buys, thus leaving everybody better off (both the producers and consumers).





Write Subquestion here...

Pro

Click "edit" and write arguments here





Con

Click "edit" and write arguments here





Write Subquestion here...

Pro

Click "edit" and write arguments here





Con

Click "edit" and write arguments here





See also

External links and resources:

Books

  • Vance Packard - The Hidden Persuaders

Problem with the site? 

Tweet a bug on bugtwits
.