Personal tools
 
Views

Debate: Allowing Lehman Brothers to fail

From Debatepedia

(Difference between revisions)
Jump to: navigation, search
Revision as of 16:47, 14 May 2009 (edit)
Brooks Lindsay (Talk | contribs)

← Previous diff
Revision as of 13:55, 8 February 2010 (edit)
Lenkahabetinova (Talk | contribs)
(category. internal link)
Next diff →
Line 106: Line 106:
|- |-
|WRITE CONTENT FOR THE "Con" BOX ABOVE THIS CODE colspan="2" width="45%" bgcolor="#F2F2F2" style="border:1px solid #BAC5FD;padding:.4em;padding-top: 0.5em ;"| |WRITE CONTENT FOR THE "Con" BOX ABOVE THIS CODE colspan="2" width="45%" bgcolor="#F2F2F2" style="border:1px solid #BAC5FD;padding:.4em;padding-top: 0.5em ;"|
-==External links==+==See also==
 +*[[Debate: Are some companies too big to fail?]]
 +==External links and resources==
|} |}
Line 115: Line 117:
[[Category:Banks]] [[Category:Banks]]
[[Category:Government intervention]] [[Category:Government intervention]]
 +[[Category:Underdeveloped debates]]

Revision as of 13:55, 8 February 2010

Was the US government justified in allowing Lehman Brothers to fail?

Background and context

Write Subquestion here...

Pro

Click on the pencil icon and research and write arguments here





Con

Click on the pencil icon and research and write arguments here





Write Subquestion here...

Pro

Click on the pencil icon and research and write arguments here





Con

Click on the pencil icon and research and write arguments here





Write Subquestion here...

Pro

Click on the pencil icon and research and write arguments here





Con

Click on the pencil icon and research and write arguments here





See also

External links and resources

Problem with the site? 

Tweet a bug on bugtwits
.