Debate Digest: Teacher-student friendships on Facebook, Law school, Balanced budget amendment, US debt ceiling deal.
Debate: Allowing Lehman Brothers to fail
From Debatepedia
(Difference between revisions)
Revision as of 16:47, 14 May 2009 (edit) Brooks Lindsay (Talk | contribs) ← Previous diff |
Revision as of 13:55, 8 February 2010 (edit) Lenkahabetinova (Talk | contribs) (category. internal link) Next diff → |
||
Line 106: | Line 106: | ||
|- | |- | ||
|WRITE CONTENT FOR THE "Con" BOX ABOVE THIS CODE colspan="2" width="45%" bgcolor="#F2F2F2" style="border:1px solid #BAC5FD;padding:.4em;padding-top: 0.5em ;"| | |WRITE CONTENT FOR THE "Con" BOX ABOVE THIS CODE colspan="2" width="45%" bgcolor="#F2F2F2" style="border:1px solid #BAC5FD;padding:.4em;padding-top: 0.5em ;"| | ||
- | ==External links== | + | ==See also== |
+ | *[[Debate: Are some companies too big to fail?]] | ||
+ | ==External links and resources== | ||
|} | |} | ||
Line 115: | Line 117: | ||
[[Category:Banks]] | [[Category:Banks]] | ||
[[Category:Government intervention]] | [[Category:Government intervention]] | ||
+ | [[Category:Underdeveloped debates]] |
Revision as of 13:55, 8 February 2010
Was the US government justified in allowing Lehman Brothers to fail? |
Background and context |