Debate Digest: Teacher-student friendships on Facebook, Law school, Balanced budget amendment, US debt ceiling deal.
Debate: Affirmative action
From Debatepedia
| Revision as of 02:30, 28 September 2007 (edit) Brooks Lindsay (Talk | contribs) ← Previous diff |
Revision as of 22:06, 28 September 2007 (edit) Brooks Lindsay (Talk | contribs) (→Write Subquestion here...) Next diff → |
||
| Line 23: | Line 23: | ||
| |colspan="2" width="45%" bgcolor="#F2F2F2" style="border:1px solid #BAC5FD;padding:.4em;padding-top:0.5em;"| | |colspan="2" width="45%" bgcolor="#F2F2F2" style="border:1px solid #BAC5FD;padding:.4em;padding-top:0.5em;"| | ||
| - | ===Write Subquestion here...=== | + | ===Compensation: Is affirmative action justified as compensation for past wrongs to a group?=== |
| |- | |- | ||
| |width="45%" bgcolor="#FFFAE0" style="border:1px solid #BAC5FD;padding:.4em;padding-top:0.5em;"| | |width="45%" bgcolor="#FFFAE0" style="border:1px solid #BAC5FD;padding:.4em;padding-top:0.5em;"| | ||
| ====Yes==== | ====Yes==== | ||
| - | ''Click on the pencil icon and research and write arguments here'' | + | When members of targeted groups are actively sought or preferred, the reason given is usually that this is necessary to compensate for advantages that other groups are said to have had (such as through institutional racism or institutional sexism or historical circumstances). |
| |width="45%" bgcolor="#F2FAFB" style="border:1px solid #BAC5FD;padding:.4em;padding-top:0.5em;"| | |width="45%" bgcolor="#F2FAFB" style="border:1px solid #BAC5FD;padding:.4em;padding-top:0.5em;"| | ||
| ====No==== | ====No==== | ||
| - | ''Click on the pencil icon and research and write arguments here'' | + | '''Many groups that have been victims to institutional racism are actually harmed by affirmative action instead of compensated:''' Asian Americans are an example of this, where they have been victims of institutional racism, but whom are harmed by affirmative action since it benefits largely black and Hispanic populations. Thus, how can compensation for past injustices be a justification, when this rule is applied arbitrarily. |
| |- | |- | ||
| |colspan="2" width="45%" bgcolor="#F2F2F2" style="border:1px solid #BAC5FD;padding:.4em;padding-top:0.5em;"| | |colspan="2" width="45%" bgcolor="#F2F2F2" style="border:1px solid #BAC5FD;padding:.4em;padding-top:0.5em;"| | ||
| - | |||
| ===Write Subquestion here...=== | ===Write Subquestion here...=== | ||
Revision as of 22:06, 28 September 2007
Is Affirmative Action education legislation in the United States a good idea? |
Background and Context of Debate: |
Compensation: Is affirmative action justified as compensation for past wrongs to a group? | |
YesWhen members of targeted groups are actively sought or preferred, the reason given is usually that this is necessary to compensate for advantages that other groups are said to have had (such as through institutional racism or institutional sexism or historical circumstances). |
NoMany groups that have been victims to institutional racism are actually harmed by affirmative action instead of compensated: Asian Americans are an example of this, where they have been victims of institutional racism, but whom are harmed by affirmative action since it benefits largely black and Hispanic populations. Thus, how can compensation for past injustices be a justification, when this rule is applied arbitrarily. |
Write Subquestion here... | |
YesClick on the pencil icon and research and write arguments here |
NoClick on the pencil icon and research and write arguments here |
Write Subquestion here... | |
YesClick on the pencil icon and research and write arguments here |
NoClick on the pencil icon and research and write arguments here |
References: | |
Related pages on Debatepedia: | |
External links and resources: | |
