Personal tools
 
Views

Debate: 2009 US economic stimulus

From Debatepedia

(Difference between revisions)
Jump to: navigation, search
Revision as of 01:44, 9 February 2009 (edit)
Brooks Lindsay (Talk | contribs)

← Previous diff
Revision as of 01:46, 9 February 2009 (edit)
Brooks Lindsay (Talk | contribs)

Next diff →
Line 28: Line 28:
|WRITE SUBQUESTION BETWEEN "=== ===" width="45%" bgcolor="#FFFAE0" style="border:1px solid #BAC5FD;padding:.4em;padding-top:0.5em;"| |WRITE SUBQUESTION BETWEEN "=== ===" width="45%" bgcolor="#FFFAE0" style="border:1px solid #BAC5FD;padding:.4em;padding-top:0.5em;"|
====Pro==== ====Pro====
-''Click on the pencil icon and research and write arguments here''+*"Pumping Life Back into the U.S. Economy: Why a Stimulus Package Must Be Big and Targeted."
- +
- +
- +
- +
- +
Line 121: Line 116:
|} |}
 +
 +[[Category:United States]]
 +[[Category:Economics]]
 +[[Category:Legislation]]
 +[[Category:Economic crisis]]
 +[[Category:Recession]]

Revision as of 01:46, 9 February 2009

Write debate main question here...

Contents

Background and Context of Debate:

Write Subquestion here...

Pro

  • "Pumping Life Back into the U.S. Economy: Why a Stimulus Package Must Be Big and Targeted."


Con

Click on the pencil icon and research and write arguments here





Write Subquestion here...

Pro

Click on the pencil icon and research and write arguments here





Con

Click on the pencil icon and research and write arguments here





Write Subquestion here...

Pro

Click on the pencil icon and research and write arguments here





Con

Click on the pencil icon and research and write arguments here





References:

Related pages on Debatepedia:

External links and resources:

Problem with the site? 

Tweet a bug on bugtwits
.