Argument: There is sufficient review process for detainees at Guantanamo

Welcome to Debatepedia! | About | Help | FAQ | Media Kit

	Views Article Discussion Edit History
Search Navigation Debatepedia Home IDEA Home Recent Changes Featured articles Upcoming features Contents guide getting started User Guide Create a debate Create an argument Pro/con structure Twitter Donate! Other resources Contact Internships Facebook group Useful links Link exchanges NFL resolution topics Other IDEA projects National Debate Series: Boston In other languages Toolbox What links here Related changes Upload file Special pages Printable version Permanent link	Debate Digest: Teacher-student friendships on Facebook, Law school, Balanced budget amendment, US debt ceiling deal. Argument: There is sufficient review process for detainees at Guantanamo From Debatepedia Revision as of 02:11, 10 January 2008; Brooks Lindsay (Talk \| contribs) (diff) ←Older revision \| Current revision \| Newer revision→ (diff) Jump to: navigation, search Parent debate Debate:Guantanamo Bay Supporting evidence Washington Post. "Close Guantanamo?". June 22, 2006 - "[Detainees'] continued detention is reviewed once a year by military boards, and prisoners are assigned advocates to help argue their cases. Pending a decision by the Supreme Court, they are also able to appeal their detentions to U.S. federal courts, and many have U.S. civilian lawyers." Retrieved from "http://dbp.idebate.org/en/index.php/Argument:_There_is_sufficient_review_process_for_detainees_at_Guantanamo"

Problem with the site?

Parent debate