Debate Digest: Teacher-student friendships on Facebook, Law school, Balanced budget amendment, US debt ceiling deal.
Argument: There is sufficient review process for detainees at Guantanamo
From Debatepedia
(Difference between revisions)
| Revision as of 02:11, 10 January 2008 (edit) Brooks Lindsay (Talk | contribs) ← Previous diff |
Current revision (15:43, 14 June 2010) (edit) Lenkahabetinova (Talk | contribs) (→Parent debate) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| ==Parent debate== | ==Parent debate== | ||
| - | *[[Debate:Guantanamo Bay]] | + | *[[Debate: Guantanamo Bay detention center]] |
| - | + | ||
| ==Supporting evidence== | ==Supporting evidence== | ||
| *[http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2006/06/21/AR2006062101519.html Washington Post. "Close Guantanamo?". June 22, 2006] - "[Detainees'] continued detention is reviewed once a year by military boards, and prisoners are assigned advocates to help argue their cases. Pending a decision by the Supreme Court, they are also able to appeal their detentions to U.S. federal courts, and many have U.S. civilian lawyers." | *[http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2006/06/21/AR2006062101519.html Washington Post. "Close Guantanamo?". June 22, 2006] - "[Detainees'] continued detention is reviewed once a year by military boards, and prisoners are assigned advocates to help argue their cases. Pending a decision by the Supreme Court, they are also able to appeal their detentions to U.S. federal courts, and many have U.S. civilian lawyers." | ||
Current revision
[Edit]
Parent debate
[Edit]
Supporting evidence
- Washington Post. "Close Guantanamo?". June 22, 2006 - "[Detainees'] continued detention is reviewed once a year by military boards, and prisoners are assigned advocates to help argue their cases. Pending a decision by the Supreme Court, they are also able to appeal their detentions to U.S. federal courts, and many have U.S. civilian lawyers."
