Personal tools
 
Views

Argument: The EMF siphons off capital, increases national borrowing costs

From Debatepedia

Revision as of 01:21, 18 October 2010; Brooks Lindsay (Talk | contribs)
(diff) ←Older revision | Current revision | Newer revision→ (diff)
Jump to: navigation, search

Parent debate

Supporting quotations

Joseph Gokhale. "Forget The European Monetary Fund." Forbes. March 2010: The "EMF borrowing on financial markets would immediately siphon off investible capital and increase interest rates. If the EMF is sizable, it would make public borrowing by national treasuries more costly, directly and immediately."

Problem with the site? 

Tweet a bug on bugtwits
.