Personal tools
 
Views

Argument: Targeted assassinations significantly disrupt terrorist organizations

From Debatepedia

(Difference between revisions)
Jump to: navigation, search
Revision as of 02:47, 3 June 2008 (edit)
Brooks Lindsay (Talk | contribs)

← Previous diff
Revision as of 02:47, 3 June 2008 (edit)
Brooks Lindsay (Talk | contribs)
(Parent debate)
Next diff →
Line 1: Line 1:
==Parent debate== ==Parent debate==
-*[[Debate:Assassinations of Dictators]]+*[[Debate:Assassination of a Dictator]]
- +
==Supporting quotations== ==Supporting quotations==

Revision as of 02:47, 3 June 2008

Parent debate

Supporting quotations

Gal Luft. "The Logic of Israel's Targeted Killing". Middle East Quarterly. Winter 2003 - "Most important, claim the critics, there is no compelling evidence the killings are effective in reducing the terror menace.

This is exactly where they have it wrong. True, terror persists despite the assassinations, and the policy does have shortcomings. What is less apparent is the profound cumulative effect of targeted killing on terrorist organizations. Constant elimination of their leaders leaves terrorist organizations in a state of confusion and disarray. Those next in line for succession take a long time to step into their predecessors' shoes. They know that by choosing to take the lead, they add their names to Israel's target list, where life is Hobbesian: nasty, brutish, and short.

Fighting terror is like fighting car accidents: one can count the casualties but not those whose lives were spared by prevention. Hundreds, if not thousands, of Israelis go about their lives without knowing that they are unhurt because their murderers met their fate before they got the chance to carry out their diabolical missions. This silent multitude is the testament to the policy's success."

Problem with the site? 

Tweet a bug on bugtwits
.