Personal tools

Argument: Security scans of children are not pornographic

From Debatepedia

Jump to: navigation, search

Parent debate

Supporting quotations

Arthur Weinreb. "Full-body scanners; it's just common sense." Canada Free Press. January 8, 2010: "Minors should be scanned and to link these scans to child porn is ludicrous. Police officers routinely possess child pornography all the time. Not only do they possess it but they distribute it to prosecutors who further distribute it to defense lawyers. Then the prosecutors further distribute it to judges who show juries. For some reason these people aren’t considered to have committed criminal acts because they are doing what they do to protect the public. Just like those who operate full body scanners are doing."

Problem with the site? 

Tweet a bug on bugtwits