Personal tools
 
Views

Argument: No Child Left Behind reveal nothing new about school performance

From Debatepedia

(Difference between revisions)
Jump to: navigation, search
Revision as of 16:47, 18 February 2009 (edit)
Brooks Lindsay (Talk | contribs)

← Previous diff
Current revision (16:59, 18 February 2009) (edit)
Brooks Lindsay (Talk | contribs)

 
Line 1: Line 1:
==Parent debate== ==Parent debate==
*[[Debate: No Child Left Behind Act]] *[[Debate: No Child Left Behind Act]]
-*[[Resolved: That on balance, the No Child Left Behind Act of 2001 has improved academic achievement in the United States (section)]]+*[[Resolved: That on balance, the No Child Left Behind Act of 2001 has improved academic achievement in the United States]]
==Supporting quotations== ==Supporting quotations==
Connecticut Education Commissioner Betty Sternberg - "[We] won’t learn anything new about our schools by giving these extra tests."[http://www.amconmag.com/article/2005/aug/01/00025/] Connecticut Education Commissioner Betty Sternberg - "[We] won’t learn anything new about our schools by giving these extra tests."[http://www.amconmag.com/article/2005/aug/01/00025/]

Current revision

Parent debate

Supporting quotations

Connecticut Education Commissioner Betty Sternberg - "[We] won’t learn anything new about our schools by giving these extra tests."[1]

Problem with the site? 

Tweet a bug on bugtwits
.