Personal tools

Argument: NAFTA and other FTAs make multilateral free trade agreements more difficult to construct

From Debatepedia

Revision as of 16:01, 5 October 2007; Brooks Lindsay (Talk | contribs)
(diff) ←Older revision | Current revision | Newer revision→ (diff)
Jump to: navigation, search

Parent debate(s)

Supporting evidence

  • "The Pros and Cons of Pursuing Free-Trade Agreements". The Congressional Budget Office. July 31, 2003 - "Critics worry, however, that the pursuit of free-trade agreements could divert the world from multilateral negotiations and lead to the development of rival trading blocs centered on the United States, the European Union (EU), and Japan. Indeed, the EU has negotiated a number of FTAs in recent years. Critics also argue that because of differences in negotiating dynamics, FTAs between small developing countries and such large entities as the United States or the EU are likely to leave in place some trade barriers that multilateral negotiations in the absence of FTAs would eliminate. Foreign-policy and tactical considerations must be weighed alongside the economic arguments in determining whether the pursuit of FTAs is an advisable path to the goal of multilateral free trade."

Problem with the site? 

Tweet a bug on bugtwits